Yes, and the 100 mpg carburetor, too. Also the alien bodies in Area 51 and the real identities of the men who killed JFK and what really happend to Jimmy Hoffa ...
Is the US government intentionally supressing a cancer cure?
by Nathan Natas 52 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
No Room For George
Even though this guy's credibility is questionable, I've always believed the US goverment is supressing cures for cancer. I'd venture to say the same with HIV/AIDS. This country is about greed, money, power, and the powers that be in this country could care less about their fellow man. I forget who said it, and also the exact way it was stated, but capitalism is home based colonialism. That being said, the most unscrupulous people in this country are your Wall Street types and politicians. There's more money in people being sick with supposedly incurable diseases, than there is with a healthy population.
It's the same with the prison system and the so called war on drugs in this country. That cocksucker Ronald Reagan and that whore he was married to, along with like minded people, could care less about the druggies in this country getting help. Rather, they've created an entire prison based industry on drug addicts. The Crack Laws which stipulate higher sentencing as opposed to the lower sentences recieved by those convicted for cocaine related offenses, is a classic case of population control and how to screw one demographic of people, while being more lenient towards your "own people" if you catch my drift. The more people in prison, creates more income and work for correction officers, more money for the construction of prisons, lawyers, prosecutors, judges, the whole system is designed to make money off a problem, rather than to correct the problem. It's the exact same thing when it comes to a cure for cancer or HIV. This country is beyond the pale horse and then some.
-
Nathan Natas
I'll admit I didn't know anything about Mercola's reputation, but as Robdar pointed out, the subject of this thread is Dr. Burzynski.
For the benefit of those who are reluctant to spend 100 minutes with this educational movie, here are some highlights that I feel are significant:
1. Right now the "state of the art" treatment for cancer that is promoted by the FDA involves the use of several toxic chemotherapy agents that themselves are toxic to the patient. The possible side effects of some of these agents is CANCER. Also approved for use are various radiation treatments, which also have negative side effects.
2. Dr. Burzynski discovered that many cancer victims are lacking in certain proteins and peptides that are abundant in healthy people, and he wondered if these proteins and peptides had a cancer supressing effect. Her found a way to isolate these compounds and eventually developed a method of synthesizing them. Burzynski patented several of the compounds and methods he uses in his treatment of cancer. As a group, these compounds are called antineoplastons.
3. Treament of cancer victims with Burzynski's formula worked more often than the traditional treatments, and they worked without any side effects.
4. The FDA has tried multiple times to shut Burzynski down with grand jury investigations of what the FDA claims were illegal activities regarding the treatment of Burzynski's patients. Most of these witchunts were complete failures.
5. After trying to shut Burzynski down for many years, the FDA changed its tune and had the patent office issue patents which had previously been given to Burzynski to the FDA and the US government, then began drug trials which according to Burzynski are flawed and intented to cause the trial to fail.
-
aquagirl
http://www.sawilsons.com/gerson.htm Check out the Gerson method.Amazing.I know one woman personaly who went thru it.Never underestimate the greed of the Big Pharms.
-
Nathan Natas
When Burzynski began his work, he extracted the antineoplastons from human urine. Eventually he started synthesizing the antineoplastons.
one criticism of Burzynski focused on this "urine extract" sensationalism. Apparently the FDA forgot that the approved female drug treatment called "premarin" is produced from PMU, which stands for "Pregnant Mare Urine, " or horse piss. Since 1942 PMU has been the source of this drug - it is not produced synthetically, as Burzynski's antineoplastons are now.
-
bohm
nn, how many people was involved in each of these studies?
-
Nathan Natas
Many. Watch the movie. Or don't. I don't care.
-
bohm
NN, can you give me a reference to a paper describing one of the studies? (do not have to be in a peer-reviewed journal) who were the patients, was it double bind, how many participated, how was success measured...
-
Nathan Natas
I believe the movie addresses this.
-
bohm
NN, its just that when i read the webite, i see things like this:
Success Rates of Chemo and Radiation versus Antineoplastons
The film features several remarkable case stories of people who were successfully cured of cancer, but it's when the clinical trial data of conventional therapies versus antineoplastons are stacked against each other that the benefits of antineoplastons become really obvious:
Radiation or Chemotherapy Only Antineoplastons Only 5 of 54 patients (9 percent)
were cancer free at the end of treatment5 of 20 (25 percent)
were cancer free at the end of treatmentobviously this lack references, and the sample-sizes are very very small. are proper references given in the video? are the studies double-blind?