The Fukushima nuclear disaster is claimed that Japanese government which was troubled with the place of dumping for the nuclear waste was selling off secretly the plutonium to Iran.
The Zionist of Israel who found this and flew into rage caused the tsunami earthquake (M6.8) as retaliation to East Japan by the atomic bomb, devising computer virus and exploding mini atomic bomb in the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
The cause of the Fukushima nuclear disaster
by s-kudaka 10 Replies latest social current
-
s-kudaka
-
Broken Promises
Were the Zionists part of the reptilian Illuminati bloodline?
-
HintOfLime
Any questions?
- Lime
-
What-A-Coincidence
HAARP
-
HintOfLime
The Fukushima nuclear disaster is claimed that Japanese government which was troubled with the place of dumping for the nuclear waste was selling off secretly the plutonium to Iran.
One must really respect the use of the old "proper-noun present-tense copula past-tense verb proper-noun past-tense copula past-tense verb noun past-tense verb noun past-tense copula past-tense verb adverb proper-noun" sentence structure.
Always a classic.
- Lime
-
s-kudaka
The safety control of all nuclear power plants in Japan are provided by Israeli firm.
So Japanese nuclear security is at the mercy of Israel.
Media in Japan have not reported this fact.
The artificial earthquake is caused not only with HAARP but with the pure hydrogen bomb.
Investigate the Internet. -
Broken Promises
One must really respect the use of the old "proper-noun present-tense copula past-tense verb proper-noun past-tense copula past-tense verb noun past-tense verb noun past-tense copula past-tense verb adverb proper-noun" sentence structure.
Always a classic.
Going by the user name, I'm assuming the poster is not a native speaker of English, and when this is the case, I try not to be too judgemental of their grammar. Although I know phrases and words in several languages, I am not a fluent speaker in any but English, so I am careful not to allow the rafter in my eye distort my view of someone else's straw.
That said, the information he is presenting is nothing but a conspiracist theory.
BP, of the Shoot The Message, Not the Messager Class
-
Black Sheep
I heard it was because the ballcock in the men"s loo got stuck.
-
NeckBeard
Japan not hit by 9.0 quake? False flag nuclear weaponry actually destroyed Fukushima, claims report
Sunday, June 12, 2011 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
(NaturalNews) What if the alleged 9.0+ magnitude mega earthquake that was said to have hit off the coast of Japan back on March 11 never actually happened, and the resultant tsunami that destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant was actually a deliberate, false flag attack using nuclear weapons? Freelance journalist Jim Stone offers compelling evidence that the official story we have all been told concerning the disaster is a phony coverup for a concerted attack against Japan, possibly for offering to enrichuraniumfor Iran.
An actual 9.0+ mega-quake would have leveled the whole country ofJapan
Consider first the massive impact of an actual 9.0 magnitudeearthquake, which would have been about 100 times more powerful than the 6.8 magnitude Great Hanshin earthquake of 1995 that destroyed much of the city of Kobe, located about 12.5 miles from the epicenter, and that killed more than 6,400people. If the March 11 earthquake in Japan was actually a 9.0, it would have devastated everything within a 1,000-mile radius of the epicenter -- and yet the city of Sendai, for example, which is only about 48 miles from the epicenter, suffered virtually no structural damage whatsoever.
Truth be told, the only areas that suffered any significant damage at all were areas hit by thetsunami, which included theFukushimanuclear plant. Besides the immense damage that occurred at the tsunami-hitnuclearplant, there was virtually no seismic damage in any other towns orcitiesnear the epicenter that were not hit by the tsunami, which suggests that the earthquake could not have been anywhere close to a 9.0. According to Stone'sreview, the size of the earthquake that hit off Japan's coast actually registered at only about a 6.67 magnitude, according to some readings, while the tsunami that ensued was the equivalent of what would have occurred during an actual 9.0.Cities and towns hit by tsunami appeared strangely unaware that it was even coming
Another factor to consider is that the towns and cities hit by the tsunami appeared to be largely unaware that it was even coming until moments before it arrived. If a 9.0 earthquake had actually hit as claimed, these areas would have not only experienced monumental destruction beforehand, but people living in them would have already been evacuating the area between when the earthquake supposedly hit, and roughly 40 minutes later when the tsunami actually arrived.
Variousvideoclips and photos in towns and cities about to be hit by the approaching tsunami reveal that business was largely taking place a usual just minutes before it hit. People are shown walking around, buildings are intact, and little appears to be out of place, despite the fact that a mega-quake has supposedly just occurred. Take a look for yourself at Stone'sinformation, as well as photos and videos captured, and think to yourself whether or not the official story makes sense inlightof what actually took place (http://www.abeldanger.net/2011/05/j...).The damage at Fukushima, and particularly at non-operational Reactor 4, could not have occurred simply from flooding or an earthquake
According to Stone's analysis, the damage that took place at the Fukushima nuclear facility could not have been the result of just flooding or even a 9.0 earthquake, assuming that one actually occurred. High-resolution aerial images of the damaged plant taken on March 24 show not only a completely missing Reactor 3, despite ongoing reports that it was still there, but also a completely demolished Reactor 4.
Remember the massiveexplosionthat took place at Reactor 3 just a few days after the tsunami hit? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw2A...) Blamed onhydrogenbuildup, this disastrous event could not have occurred as a result of damage caused by the earthquake or tsunami because a special emergency hydrogen stack designed specifically to deal with hydrogen buildup had been installed at Fukushima following the disastrous Three Mile Island accident. This special hydrogen stack does not require electricity to run, so it was fully operational during the time of the explosion and would have mitigated any hydrogen buildup.
And what about the mysterious Reactor 4 explosion, which occurred despite the fact that the reactor had been de-fueled, and was allegedly non-operational? Even in a worst-case scenario where itsfuelrods completely melt down, the type of explosion that would follow would not be capable of literally disintegrating Reactor 4's thick, concrete walls, which is what actually occurred. And Reactor 4 was so heavily damaged by this explosion that it was expected to literally collapse.
So what caused these massive explosions in Reactors 3 and 4 to occur? According to Stone, nuclear weaponry was used to forcibly demolish these structures. Magna BSP, asecurityfirm, allegedly installed massive "security cameras" inside the reactors prior to the disaster. These cameras weighed over 1,000 pounds, and look oddly similar to uranium gun-type nuclear bombs (http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/co...).
When you put two and two together, it appears as thoughnuclear weaponsdisguised as security cameras may have been used to blow up Fukushima's reactors. Perhaps this explains the reason for the information blackout on Reactor 4 that occurred in the days following the disaster (http://www.naturalnews.com/031758_F...).
Add to the mix a nuclear-induced tsnuami and corresponding earthquake, and you have the perfect scapegoat for deliberately targeting a nuclear facility and blaming it onnaturalcauses.A critical analysis of the facts actually makes the official story look like aconspiracy theory
Before dismissing this information as just another wackyconspiracytheory, take the time to review Stone's analysis, and think critically about the basic laws of physics in light of the information we have been told by the media. Would a real 9.0 earthquake have left nearby cities that were not hit by the tsunami undamaged? Why did the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) withhold crucial information about Reactor 4 for so long? And why did such massive damage occur from supposed explosions that, in reality, could not have physically caused them?
These and other questions raise doubt about the official story concerning the Japan earthquake and tsunami. Of course, the reasonswhyanyone would inflict this type of disaster on purpose is a different subject entirely, but that the disaster appears to have been deliberately caused is a possibility that every critical-thinking person would do best to consider. -
botchtowersociety
Conspiracy theory? Prodigal Son and 1975 will be on this thread in no time.
It could not have been a nuclear bomb. No nukes are powerful enough to release the amount of energy this quake did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami#Energy
Energy
This earthquake released a surface energy (M e ) of 1.9±0.5×10 17 joules, [ 45 ] dissipated as shaking and tsunamic energy, which is nearly double that of the 9.1-magnitude 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami that killed 230,000 people. "If we could only harness the [surface] energy from this earthquake, it would power [a] city the size of Los Angeles for an entire year," McNutt said in an interview. [ 32 ] The total energy released, also known as the seismic moment (M 0 ), was more than 200,000 times the surface energy and was calculated by the USGS at 3.9×10 22 joules, [ 46 ] slightly less than the 2004 Indian Ocean quake. This is equivalent to 9,320 gigatons of TNT, or approximately 600 million times the energy of the Hiroshima bomb.
