I think the opening post speaks for itself. I have never known the man personally, thus I render no judgement on the "man" . . . certainly nothing based on hearsay.
Neither am I upset . . . rather, intrigued how readily some relish the opportunity to judge and condemn, whilst offering nothing in respect ot their own "dark side" to balance their judgements, hence the "He who is without sin . . . . " reference. The tendency to do this is yet another legacy to an unbalanced religious experience I suspect. I've left the JW's penchant for judging well behind me.
I'm a bit of a "straws and rafters" man I suppose, to invoke a religious perspective. Or "He who comes into a court of equity must come with clean hands" to invoke a legal one.
Principled yes . . . upset no. Take it or leave it . . . but that's the platform I speak from.
