On their forum, JW Talk, the dubbies have a thread about the year 1975: "1975 - What apostates and liard don't want you to see". A sister-dub has posted this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOE-Gm3uz-U&feature=player_embedded
Then all the dubs got extatic at the stupid arguments used by the poster. No matter what filth the Wanktower shovels in their mouths, they will chew it! Just look at some posts:
Dub 1: Great find! Sounds like my kind of language for the pathetic apostates! Thanks for posting!
Dub 2: How very true. You can usually spot an apostate after the first sentence, or by the sample sentence on an internet search. It exposes the bitterness and selfish lack of consideration for anyone else but themselves. It's very difficult not to give 'like for like' when talking about them, but we have to try. That's why we should avoid using the kind of language that they use. The other thing I always avoid, if I can, is provoking them into making a response. After all, that is the same as starting a conversation, something that is, justifiably, advised against. I came across a very disturbed individual, very early on in my ministry and I've never forgotten the experience - the brother I was with quickly left the territory. I see now what a wise decision it was.
Dub3: I remember that time in 1975. We had quite a few that believed the end would be that year and they started using their credit cards, buying like crazy. Then when nothing big happened they fell out of the truth. Grumpy firmly believed the end would come that year, but quickly turned his focus as soon as he realized his error. We just need to stay focused on standing firm until the end, instead of trying to figure out things that are out of our realm of knowledge. The Bible makes it clear how much Jehovah is willing to let us in on and the FDS will make sure we know whatever that is.
Dub4: I think the big problem with apostate reasoning is that they try to convince people 1975 was preached as official doctrine. The quotes in this video clearly show that this assertion is truly FALSE! One mistake I've heard witnesses make is they try to say that 1975 was made-up by apostates to make witnesses look bad. Also clearly from those quotes, the WT magazines did suggest the idea of 1975. I don't know how people really reacted since I wasn't around then, whether they took those suggestions and ran with them or treated them with caution, but probably in retrospect it would have been best to not suggest it in the first place. I know if the WT started printing things like "Can we say for sure the end will come in 2014? We can not know for sure but..." I would get pretty amped up, even while trying to keep those potential expectations in check. I think it wise that the FDS stays away from even mentioning specific dates. Its only natural for people to get over-excited and then disappointed (or worse) if things don't go as planned. Clearly as the video says, no man knows the day or the hour so it is wise never to speculate on a specific date. I think we can all be glad that lesson was learned and we can focus only on what is concrete.
Dub5: people have made mistakes: 1914, 1966, 1975, etc. but they have always gone against the advice of the governing body, and the governing body have always updated us straight away when they have had to adjust their thinking on a scriptural principle.
We are in the final days - fact! We do not know the day or the hour - fact! When it comes we will know exactly what we have to do...
Stupid dub 6: a few thoughts written by apostates insidious blurring even further the ignorant to see in black and white black and white. Their books and writings, this pattern is repeated. They do not focus on the Bible or its contents, but attaches to the outside eye.
Their message does not deal with Jehovah's Witnesses, or compare the procedures in relation to the content of the Bible, the apostates are familiar with, and which, of course, quite different from what people usually considered normal. Thus, many people find they read as abnormal as the lay of the Red Sea crossing
Strangely, the Jehovah's Witnesses who abandoned their almost never seem to generally associated with any other religion. Their message does seem to contain any Bible-based saving posts for which they hoped would welcome others. They do not say that the look here is a rescue, I have found something much better. They say, rather, behold, freedom has come, I am as free as Eve in Eden, Adam and I would like that.
Often the letters are produced by apostates to understand that they will continue on the road with some kind of belief, without specifying what that road is and how it could be somebody if they wish to join.
Where it is proved that the multi-dropped, just when the end is not expected to come at all for example in 1975. Is it just that they wanted to save himself. Goers, of course, was only a drop in the bucket compared to how much was left of them. However, many had been involved for selfish reasons rather than the highest commandment of love towards Matt: 22:36-38
East of the fact, however, did not get anything that the world has become badly deteriorated since 1975, and have read the Bible a little bit personal, or even if it would not have been read to say that the circumstances of the world are all over such that the end can not be far behind. This is the end of preaching throughout the world and one and the same message to a number of declarative, and thus the end of Matthew: 24:14
This link could be to look at what Jesus Himself refers to James 2:14 "What good is my brother, if someone says he has faith but he has no deeds? I guess it does not believe can save him? "While, therefore, how to live right in connection with any truth, but if your acts are contrary to their faith, and not with the Bible as scripture in the light of the Bible can not be saved. Thus, we can say that in 1975 the difference between the apostates have just been waiting in vain 75 years They had this one that could safely withdraw from the already 69 so would not have wasted six years lost their freedom.
Apostates are aware of what kind of reaction in their writings the Bible of unknown make. In fact, they are also aware that the procedures are derived, and from the writings of the Bible, but by paying attention to the rest of the ignorant reader, citing a Bible that countless people usually do not like a normal result is guaranteed. "Their word is spreading like a gangrene 2 Timothy 2: 16 to 17
Next, some of the things that apostates are very happy to discuss the scab.
1. They do not include questioning the biblical name of God JEHOVAH, or its name in the Bible as required by the necessity of using [2 moos 3.14 to 15 see footnote]
2. They do not ask we do not live for much of the writings of the Bible at the end of time.
3. Neither of them have become supporters of the ecumenical thinking so that they would argue that the good news saarnataankin as much Hindu as Muslim, or Christianity, a common accompaniment.
4. They are not making the Trinity, the fate of political science, for example, or the soul kuolemattomuusopin paradise location with views on to them because the thing is perfectly clear. They have learned the truth in connection with eläneinä the truth of things which are impossible to change.
However, their claim to the reader could get the image that the red sea crossing would have opposed the survivors. If then, some would have concluded that Moses was not God's chosen people from the channel of salvation, and it should be said that there would be menkäämmekin such a decision, of course, have all died.
