Bumpin' the thread...
Hmmm.... Interesting...
I mentioned to Curtains in a PM something about having a "code of conduct" but not "religion".
A "code of conduct" is a pattern of behavior that is instituted by society to facilitate common cooperation within the group. This behavior pattern has many advantages. It is generally based upon reason and speaks directly to issues that are concretely pertinent to the well-being of the group.
On the other hand, "religion" - and let's define that as blind obedience or nearly-blind obedience to a group leader, spiritual or otherwise, or invisible "deity" with the power of life-or-death...
"Religion" enforces its edicts with death-threats and threats of torture - whether it's "You'll burn in Hell!" or "You'll Die at Armageddon!" or "You'll be kept out of Valhalla" or "You'll be eternally reborn as a cockroach!"
There's no appeal to reason and logic, with religion. It's all emotional, irrational and based upon some fantastical imaginary force or "after-you-die" Never-Never land.
In other words, society needs a code of conduct. Religion has too many "bells, toots and whistles" - imaginary friends, weird superstitions, and so on - to be as effective as a straightforward "code of conduct".
Zid