Wording of "mentally diseased" press release - feedback?

by cedars 43 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    I changed it a little to follow the logical arugment path of "IRAC" Presening Issue, Rule (quote law) Analysis (of Facts and How it relates to law), Conclusion

    ***

    Jehovah’s Witness Violate Hate Crimes Law

    On September 11 th , a worldwide religious order declared that all dissenters were “mentally diseased” who sought “to infect others with their disloyal leadership.” The religion’s heirachy commanded followers to avoid contact with all dissenters at any costs by likening objectors to having a “contagious, deadly disease.” No, this did not occur in a radical Islamic sect, but within the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    On Setpember 11th, Jehovah's Witnesses came to these conclusions after presentation of the July 15, 2011 study edition of the Watchtower magazine (article enclosed). This edition also dissuaded followers from watching any TV news items in which former Witnesses are interviewed, or from visiting any websites or forums on which Witness beliefs are debated. These statements were read out at 1,533 congregations throughout the UK, to least 7.5 million followers in 107,210 congregations globally. Clearly, this is an attempt by the Watchtower to control the information that followers receive to evaluate their religious choice.

    The newest claim that those who disagree with the Witnesses are “mentally diseased” stems from the Church’s internal version of the Bible, the New Word Translation. Needless to say, it is a highly offensive expression both for disaffected Witnesses and for those who suffer from genuine mental illnesses. Under current UK law, the wording of the article may even constitute a “hate crime” if it is subsequently used as license by individual members to target and intimidate any who speak out against the organisation’s leadership - a group of seven men based in New York who are known as the Governing Body.

    (Quote Actual Law Here)

    Jehovah’s Witnesses are well known for their friendly but persistent door-to-door preaching. What few people realize is that once you become a Jehovah’s Witness, it is impossible to leave without losing your family and friends, and now being labeled as having a contagious, deadly mental disease. You see, current Jehovah's Witnesses use shunning as an intimidation tactic.

    All converts take a baptism oath that acknowledges the Watchtower represents Jehovah God on Earth. If the convert later concludes that Jehovah God does not direct the Church leadership or disagrees with any tenant(s), the objector is excommunicated, shunned and labeled as apostate. The Church leadership strongly encourages church elders, followers, and family members to severely shun the opposers. this means that followers are not allowed any contact with the apostate opposer. Business relationships are severed, families broken apart, and friendships cut-off. There are exceptions, such as between a parent and minor child and when there is very important family business. Followers who refuse to follow these orders are excommunicated themselves.

    As a result, many Witnesses remain trapped in the religion for years, pretending to recognize the authority of the Watchtower for no other reason than to maintain contact with their family members. Untold numbers of “trapped” Witnesses therefore live in constant fear of having their true beliefs discovered, and being ousted from their own families. Even during weekly services, followers do not show any dissention out of fear.

    The newest claim that those who disagree with the Witnesses are “mentally diseased” stems from the Church’s internal version of the Bible, the New Word Translation. Needless to say, it is a highly offensive expression both for disaffected Witnesses and for those who suffer from genuine mental illnesses. These words are taken by individual Jehovah's Witnesses as a license to target and intimidate any opposer, dissenter, or apostate who speak out against the organisation’s leadership or its beliefs. It bolsters their reasons to impose severe shunning on opposers. In my opinion, the July 15 th study edition Watchtower does violate the hate crime law because it targets and intimidates dissenters and apostates, all of whom speak out against the Jehovah’s Witness church and its leadership.

    All over the Middle East, the Arab Spring is freeing people from oppression and tyranny at the hands of ruthless dictators, and yet even in developed countries such as the UK and within seemingly benign Christian religious, there are those whose lives are influenced on a daily basis by a tyrannical religion that they desperately wish to leave but are unable to, for fear of being separated from their loved ones. To add insult to injury, such ones are now being labelled as “mentally diseased” if they make the mistake of speaking out against the Church’s leadership.

  • Open mind
    Open mind

    rebel8, I bow to you.

    Very concise. Right on the money.

    Being a wordsmith of your caliber is on my "someday before I die" list.

    Thanks,

    om

  • cedars
    cedars

    I've just contacted 8 UK newspapers to see if anyone's interested in running the story.

    I'll let you know what happens.

  • soft+gentle
    soft+gentle

    cedars

    just one point regarding this

    Under current UK law, the wording of the article may even constitute a “hate crime” if it is subsequently used as license by individual members to target and intimidate any who speak out against the organisation’s leadership - a group of seven men based in New York who are known as the Governing Body.

    once an individual has been labelled apostate Jehovahs witnesses are told not to sepak to them (apostates) anymore, so it isn't likely that individual members are going to target and intimidate those who speak out against the organisation. Be careful that you don't present something that can be easily refuted by Jehovahs witnesses.

    edit: after reading amelia's thread it is clear that Jehovahs witnesses are not violating the hate crime law. the term mentally diseased was not directed at a minority group according to the law and there is no possibility of individuals being targeted, intimidated or stalked etc as jehovahs witnesses are told to not talk to apostates - the article in question emphasizes this latter point doesn't it?

  • cedars
    cedars

    soft+gentle - no I'm not forgetting anything, I think it's more complicated than you suggest. For example, I personally hate being labelled an apostate (after all, it is the Society who has apostasized, not me), but by very definition I am an "apostate" to the Society just by posting on this forum EVEN though I am not currently DFd or DAd. There are many in a similar situation as me who live in constant fear of being ousted from their own families. I agree that it's difficult to imagine a witness committing an "offence" against another witness simply because they are committing acts of apostasy against the organization, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Some on this forum have suggested it's only a matter of time. The police who visited Amelia said that "stalking" could also be trigger action against the Society if a witness is stalked (I'm thinking elder investigations, "shepherding" etc) through suspicion of them being an apostate.

    Does that answer your point? Let me know if I've missed something...

  • soft+gentle
    soft+gentle

    cedars, no law is being broken

    apostates are treated very badly - no doubt about that and if you want to draw attn to the disfellowshipping policy then fair enough. but you can't say the WT is guilty of hate crime as defined by UK law.

  • cedars
    cedars

    Yes I agree, that's what the police said too. However, if any individual witness commits an offence (including stalking) against another witness because they consider them an apostate, the police now have the "mentally diseased" watchtower on file, and it could be successfully argued that the individual concerned committed the offence because they were incited to do so by the defammatory language in the Watchtower article.

    Does that now make sense, or am I missing something?

  • compound complex
    compound complex

    Greetings, Cedars and friends:

    I appreciate what you are doing, and, as mentioned above, our posting on this forum constitutes an act of disloyalty toward Jehovah and his Organization (so stated our WT conductor).

    I will locate and provide information (new, perhaps, to some of you) from Ray Franz regarding the Greek branch's spying on and filming a group of disaffected JWs who were holding their own memorial of the Lord's Evening Meal. The police were involved and the Society received its just deserts.

    Till later,

    CoCo

  • Pams girl
    Pams girl

    Well done Cedars et al...proud of you for your hard work x

  • cedars
    cedars

    Thanks Pams girl. I contacted 8 UK newspapers and 4 news channels by email last night with the gist of the story.

    I'll post on here if I hear anything back.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit