The recent & surprising developments in the UK and Australia got me thinking....
The Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses is nothing if not arrogant. They consider themselves "God's channel of communication", stopping just short of claiming divine inspiration. They believe that they and they alone are the masters of "Christ's belongings" and are answerable only to him.
The Watchtower Society's Legal department carefully crafts GB decisions so as not to put the Watchtower Society's assets or prestige as risk. Why did the wording of the announcement for disfellowshipping change a few years ago? Why did the questions for baptism change 20+ years ago? Why is the instruction to JW elders, upon first learning of an allegation of child abuse, to "call WT legal" before doing literally anything else?
It seems to me that given the massive egos that must exist among the GB, there would have to be some sort of resentment that they can't do everything they want to, because "legal" would have a problem with it.
I have to imagine them thinking, at least privately, "We're the Governing Body! Jehovah talks to us! Why do have to run everything past these #$%#@!! lawyers?"
I think the GB, by and large, believes their own hype. They really do think that "Jehovah talks to them". They think that the organization has some sort of "special divine protection", and as Isaiah 54:17 says, " Any weapon whatever that will be formed against you will have no success, and any tongue at all that will rise up against you in the judgment you will condemn". They think the organization just simply can't get into serious trouble.
Do you think at some point their arrogance will cause them to be careless? Would they ever override their own legal counsel? Would they ever say "We don't care what the lawyers say, we're printing it in the Watchtower!"