The Society has been cracking down hard on parents having contact with children who have left. For a long time, it was kind of a "wink-wink" thing with the "necessary family business" loophole, and a lot of families found some relief with that.
But in the latest magazines and assembly parts, they're making it crystal-clear that pretty much nothing except a death in the family counts as "necessary family business". And even then, you probably wouldn't be invited to the funeral.
The key is, they don't actually define what "necessary family business" is in the article. Which makes people feel guilty about any contact with a DF'd family member, and error on the side of caution instead.
Like everything else the Society does, it's all passive-aggressive guilt-tripping. Saying things without actually saying anything.
Have you had experience of this ?
HHG