The latest phase of the UK Charity Commission case included this:
Subsequent to the opening of the inquiry, in a letter dated 10 July 2014, Mr Cook of the Watchtower informed the Respondent that the “disfellowshipping hearing” for Mr Rose had in fact been carried out by the Elders of a different Congregation, so the Charity had played no role in that process. Mr Cook (who is the in-house solicitor at the Watchtower) later elaborated on his own letter in a witness statement for the Tribunal. He explained that the “Circuit Overseer” had taken advice from a body called “The Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses” (a non- charitable unincorporated association which provides spiritual guidance to congregations) about this issue. In accordance with that advice, he says “The Trustees of the New Moston Congregation...did not select the elders who conducted the disfellowshipping and had no control over the process they followed”.
So "The Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses" CCoJW a none incorporated, none charitable association, instruct the CO who gets an alternative JC on the case. Now we see why the DOs have gone, why the CO is separated from the .ORG. The WT thinks it keeps itself at a distance from the nuts and bolts cong problems by using the CCoJW and COs. It is trying to insulate itself from the consequences of its actions.
Who are the CCoJWs where are its offices, who are its principals. Am I being paranoid or is this the new attempt at hands off disinfectant bath trying to keep the hirearchy away from the dirt?