Hi everyone
Soft+gentle, who I'm sure we are all very fond of, has been expressing some strong opinions on my thread below:
As soft+gentle's opinions seem to be undermining the seriousness of domestic abuse, I thought the best thing would be to give soft+gentle the opportunity to defend his or her opinions on his or her very own thread. That way, you can all give her the support that he or she needs, and prove that I am being hysterical by trying to raise awareness of the Society's damaging domestic abuse rhetoric.
Here is what soft+gentle said:
I agree that witnesses privilige the sanctity of marriage over life and that the society is misogynistic and naive in how they apply their principles. But from what I have seen most of the truly horrorifying cases of domestic abuse are not recent - by recent I mean in the last 10 years. It seems to me that nowadays couples do call the police and separation is encouraged. Within the congregation both parties are given help and strong counsel where needed. Once the police are involved and if there are children, social services also get involved. I'm really glad about the outside help victims and their children are given.
Is he or she right? Soft+gentle claims that he or she reached his or her conclusions after talking to people on this forum, and indeed, domestic abuse charities. Therefore, she should have unanimous backing, and I will be publically shamed. But so be it.
(Soft+gentle - I hope you will enjoy defending your views on this, your very own thread. With greatest respect, please now leave my thread alone.)
Discuss.
Cedars