DOCUMENTS: Candace Conti v Watchtower – Court of Appeal Decision - April 2015

by jwleaks 11 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

• 

  SimonSays

  You would think, if we were all really interested in justice? We would know justice.

  Description:	Affirmed/part, rev/part, / remanded w/direction
  Date:	04/13/2015
  Status:	Final The judgment against defendants on the negligence count is affirmed. The judgment against Watchtower on the cause of action for punitive damages is reversed with directions to enter judgment for Watchtower on punitive damages. The parties are to bear their own costs on appeal.
  Publication Status:	Signed Published
  Author:	Siggins, Peter J.
  Participants:	Pollak, Stuart R. (Concur) Jenkins, Martin J. (Concur)
  Case Citation:	none

  1.

  Affirmed in part and reversed in part by

  An appellate court has upheld part of the judgment of the lower court or agency in the case you are SHEPARDIZING(TM) but has overturned the remainder of the judgment. That part of the lower court decision being overturned should no longer be considered good law. SHEPARD'S Signal: Warning - Negative treatment is indicated (Red)

  Warning (red)

  2.

  Affirmed in part and remanded in part by

  An appellate court has upheld part of the judgment of the lower court or agency in the case you are SHEPARDIZING(TM) and has returned the remainder of the judgment to the lower court for further proceedings. SHEPARD'S Signal: Caution - Possible negative treatment (Yellow)

  Caution (yellow)
• 

  DATA-DOG

  I guess it ain't over. Check out Barbara Anderson's latest post.

  DD