thank you the quiet one. I am thoroughly familiar with Mr unthanks views and his style of writing. It is very powerful and this kind of rhetoric is a significantly useful tool when all else has failed. I salute mr unthank in paying careful attention to the WTS' sytle of conveying info in order to use their persuasive techniques to prosecute them. I mean this sincerely.
But I would still like to know
1) what the congregations were actually told by the WTS
2)what the policeman was actualy told by the court sys and what the policeman actually told Mr unthank regarding compliance with wwc legislation.
It is not that I disbelieve Mr Unthank. But I would like to separate fact from interpretation of the facts.