Hey anezthy!
I hear ya, I believe.
Personally I have found what for me is overwhelming metaphysical evidence for Jesus in the 30-odd authenticity markers of the "unabridged gospel" message, map and medicine. These must be actively dangerous to religious ideology since religionists routinely remove, hide and obfuscate them.
When Martin Luther discovered the metaphysical "gospel of grace" nearly 500 years ago he was moved to set in motion events which partly liberated us from (the absolute hegemony of) religion and led to many new freedoms: expression, association, scientific and more.
Others like Dr John Dickson seem to have accumulated compelling and overwhelming physical or historical evidence: http://johndickson.org/christfiles .
The late lay archaeologist Dr Ron Wyatt (nurse anaesthetist) comes across as very plausible (to me at least) in his description of physical and metaphysical encounters with the Ark of the Covenant and Jesus' blood on it which he had tested in a lab with surprising results. His findings dovetail very well, across a vast space-time chasm, with other intimate details uncovered on my own journey.
However far more important than actual evidence is our personal (force) framework (context or worldview) we have chosen to accept in life, and through which we accept, interpret, pursue, ignore or reject all evidence. WBTS followers are a case in point although far from unique in this.