If understanding faith as such, so keeping up to speed with the known God is
possible beyond and not wanting harm for something possible and not proven, is
more liberal/progressive-reform, there's a lot more of that perspective (and
growing) in Christianity (and Judaism) outside the JWs leaders' control than
within it.
If conservatism is expecting too much, etc., the JWs leaders' conservativism
is indicated by requiring notably harsh shunning for persistent disagreement of
all JWs leaders' special rules and predictions, the refusal of blood/major blood
products for oneself or child, conservative stances on complimentarianism and
homosexuality, dress codes, old texts and evolution, etc.
The major Abrahamic religion with the highest % orthodox/conservative is
Islam, which shares several features and trends in common with the JWs, some
even extremist. (Knock knock--"Good morning, Great Satan! Can we come in and
explain our jihad? We believe God will see our willingness to sacrifice our-
selves at hospitals and spare us on that great day of death to the West.")
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_schools_and_branches
For balance, I'd add that you can't expect too much from atheism, either. It
just means rejection of belief in God or gods. It doesn't specify anything
about character, adherance to rationalism and rejection of anything beyond
what's objectively proven is other regards, rejection of bigotry or crime or
even rejection of other beliefs (astrology, political extremism, etc.).
Harmful stipulations go beyond the basic God concept, too (see How to Think
About God, Mortimer Adler). A believer or non-believer may reject those
stipulations.
Common human selfishness, including to put up a wall of alienation and be
'centric and intolerant about those on the other side of it, is an unfortunately
common example of being "too much" and has caused the most harm by believers and
non-believers. As usual, the most diplomatic thing I can recommend is that the
believers and non-believers who don't want harm over such things, are more
liberal/progressive on the points given above, agree to not like the harm of
believers and non-believers.