Quendi, you raise an interesting point about the magazines appearing more simplistic in content and perfunctory over time. That could well be a justified perception.
I remember reading the hefty tome released in 1963 entitled Babylon the Great has Fallen God's Kingdom Rules. That book was several hundred pages in length and to a young inquisitive kid it was absolutely engrossing. It provided a reasonably in-depth historical account of major events (sure, skewed to fit the Watchtower's cranky chronology). It didn't treat readers like uneducated idiots. It discussed complex issues and provoked in me a fascination with Biblical and secular histories. Okay, so memories can play tricks on one's mind. Maybe if I read that book now I'd think what a load of rubbish. Yet at the time the book had me riveted and fired up.
Nowadays, there's no equivalent publication to excite interest. Every publication is pitched drearily at a basic reading level, the writing simplistic, repetitive and oh-so-creepingly bland. Smiling faces predominate. Can I be forgiven for missing the starkly violent pictures from earlier decades showing churches rent in two and the wicked men, women and children getting their comeuppance, fear engraved on their soon-to-be-killed faces. Oh such stirring stuff for theatrical souls like me! (I don't get you Americans lily-white abhorrence of such pictures. Way to go! say I)
Importantly, the people who matter - the rank and file - ain't complaining about the simpleton's diet...I suspect because they're not reading that much to realize.. or even care.