Diest, If I get some good reviews from other deafies, I will try them again.
Rick Fearon, I am disappointed in you from what I have seen those comments here
by Iamallcool 16 Replies latest jw friends
-
mrsjones5
Lama, I listened to most of Rick's program last night. Yeah there was some corny bits at the beginning but who cares, it's a show. Rick did a good job, asked good questions and overall conducted a good interview. Attorney Rick seemed to enjoy being on the show, answered as many questions as he had time for and was very gracious in his conduct. I heard nothing for which anyone should be ashamed of Rick for.
I do wish that there was some sort of way a written transcript of the show could be made available for those who would like or need it.
-
Nathan Natas
IAMALLCOOL SAID, " I think he has a long way to go."
Compared to you, Rick has made the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs. He's running ionic hyperdrive and your running on whine.
but it sure is easy to complain, isn't it?
-
ohiocowboy
Nathan, you are one of the most balanced posters here! If more people were like you, this site would be a LOT better than it already is! I appreciate your positive attitude, and the fact that you give others a chance, especially when they are ridiculed and bullied for what they believe in.
You are a Good person!!!
-
Diest
What truely makes Nathan great are his Star Wars References.
-
panhandlegirl
All I can say is that I know nothing about Rick Fearon but I think he did a good job last night. I was on from 6:30 until midnight when Barbara left. When Barbara went on into another man's show, who wanted to talk about theology (I think), Barbara said she stayed to answer questions. Rick intrerruped the man to say that many people were waiting to talk to Barbara and the man let her answer questions. I think he did a good job. We got to hear a lot of information from the attorney and Barbara. Some, including me, from JWN got to ask questions. That, to me was the pupose of the program and the goal was met.
-
ShirleyW
Nathan Natas - Re: your two posts above . . . DITTO