I have a saying, repeated here at times, ''The law is an ass''.
We know how excited we were when the unthank case was hot and how the magistrate slam dunked it into the trash can. Not wanting to debate the how and why's of Stevens methods, just that the law had an opportunity to actually uphold the law and chose not to. The law allowed the WT to trample on the law and did nothing. Could have set a precedent, could have but was spineless.
Now we see a much much larger case on the rise, one that went a long way, one where a jury of ordinary people did their duty and found the WT guilty.
The appeal however will have none of this, it is just a room full of legal eagles disecting words and meanings of jargon that most of us wouldnt follow. teams of lawyers who will not see victims but technicalities of law.
And that is what may sink this. The law may decide no case. The law seldom works for people, it works for corporations with lots of money. I wouldn't be betting the appeal is dismissed, sad to say, i would wager the WT will get off scott free, not because they should, but because the law is an ass.
Oz