The only problem with the Uncyclopedia article is it's a bit too close to reality. Needs a bit more hyperbole for Uncyclopedia's usual style.
Sparlock entry at Uncyclopedia
by IsaacJ22 21 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Jeffro
Here is a perfectly reliable source for the Wikipedia article.
From Oxford Professor Richard Dawkins, no less.
http://richarddawkins.net/discussions/646112-anyone-heard-of-sparlock-the-new-ex-jehovah-s-witness-meme/comments?page=1The site is a blog, which isn't a reliable source per Wikipedia's standards. Additionally, it wasn't 'from Richard Dawkins' at all, but is simply on a discussion site that include Dawkins' name. The 'comments' page to which you've linked is a response to an article on the blog by ISAACJ, the author of the Wikipedia article.