There is NOTHING I'm more passionate about in life than FOOTBALL. ITS LIFE!
Greatest thread in weeks.
NFL running backs....particularly the franchise 'feature' back began to decline in the late 90's and throughout the 2000's. There are a couple of factors that have contributed:
- Average lifespan of a runningback is 3 years. No longer were teams willing to draft and pay big $$'s for one player....especially one that would be gone in a few years. Many teams adopted the strategy of taking a couple of 'good' backs in later rounds...with the emphasis on one that could catch the ball (a 3rd down back type: Darren Sproles) or a goal line pile mover (Michael Turner, Jermoe Bettis, LaGarrette Blount) ........it saved money..... and you got the best of both worlds.
- Decline in feature back talent: When is the last time you saw a really dominant back come out of college. Reggie Bush? He didn't translate well at the next level (see 3rd down back). Trent Richardson has a "Jamal Lewis" feel to him....he will be good....but great? Enh.
- Spread Offenses: You can thank my 1999 St. Louis Rams for that trend. Martz instituted pieces of the Air Coryell offense into his.....teams were spreading out.....3-5 receiver sets.......teams needs WR's....not RBs. Marshall Faulk was almost another WR.....who could also run the ball. The Patriots, Colts, etc. have all gone to spread type offenses. The trend continues, leaving little need for a feature back.
I think those three factors have played a huge role. Gone are the days of Earl Campbell, Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith. The latest trends is to get a BIG tight end that can out run linebackers.