Just here casually. I suspect someone like my father might have a no meetings injunction against him but not b/c of the Witnesses. He was pathological and that could be proven. He used the Witnesses as a cudgel to back up his authority. His authority was self-styled and had no reality in law. Of course, tell a little kid being beat and punished that.
Someone not willing to compromise on either side might earn the ire of a judge. It is dependent on the facts before the court. Applies to JWs , in particular, is not const'l.
Any Roman Catholic, Baptist, or Pentecostal could earn demerits, too.
Zealotry, at the expense of the child's welfare, will not pay. It will penalize. I must state that my JW aunt and uncle would have made great parents.
The Amish Supreme Court decision, allowing them to not finish mandatory state education, infuriated me. I wanted to devote my life to evening the playing field. The sad part is that parents carry emotional baggage. It is hard to walk away from them, even if you know you must or you will die. Education is so central in civil rights law but Amish children have no rights.
I stopped attending KH by announcing that the police would have to handcuff me and take me there. And I was very serious.
This entire area continues to excite me, revolt me, and leaves me confused.