I will refrain from the use of the word apostate.
No, that's not the entire problem. Yes, it's an insulting term, but it's the attitude behind it. It's the attitude that EVERYTHING that someone that disagrees with the WTS says is "diseased". It causes one to dismiss every single point the other person makes, and not consider them. You have a point to prove and NOTHING the other person says has any validation.
I've seen it on the Great Crowd thread. You can't concede to a single point. EVERYTHING that is different from the Watchtower is invalid. They are right about everything.
Recovery, you have to acknowledge that if the Watchtower changed their view about something, you would fight just as hard to try and prove that they are NOW right and were not right before. It has nothing to do with your own research. On this site you are just attempting to repeat what the Watchtower currently teaches. You did not come to this knowledge based on your own research of the Bible. You take what they teach and your goal is to repeat it. You are not trying to verify that you are believing the right thing. You aren't asking, "Is what they are saying true?" No, you are saying "This is true" and then you are trying to repeat it no matter what arguments are valid or not.
Why is it that nearly every greek scholar has stated that it is impossible that the Great Crowd spoken of in Revelation is on earth? There are NO greek scholars at the Watchtower. Yet you would prefer to go with the high school graduates with no college rather than the people that know what they are talking about.
The interesting thing on the Great Crowd thread is that we ALL used to believe what you are saying. We used the EXACT SAME "FACTS" that you are trying to use. But most of us have seen that this was a twisting of scripture and showed a complete lack of knowledge of Greek and simple hermeneutics. I still don't know why the society does not understand how to interpret scripture, or other literature for that matter. Look up hermeneutics on the WT library. It's not there. That's because they don't know how to interpret scripture. They only know how to use "proof texts" and argue those single texts.