In this forum, we often wonder what we can do to make the Society look bad. We come up with ideas like picketing assemblies, mail campaigns, legal action, and many others. Although these ideas are laudable and I would not want to discourage anyone, they sometimes create sympathy for the Witnesses, and make us look bitter and fanatical. Besides which, I wonder if they are really even necessary. In the past two weeks, the Society has done a spectacular job of publicly self destructing, all by themselves. Consider these two examples:
1) A seriously ill girl in Calgary is given a chance to live by her father and the courts. There is already a tremendous amount of sympathy for the father. Then the Society flies in its corporate lawyer, and proceeds to shun the man. This is pasted all over the front page of the paper. No apostates are involved.
2) A man suffering from depression is disfellowshipped for nothing more than doctrinal disagreements. The organization heaps social, psychological, family, and financial pressures upon him. He snaps, killing five innocent people and himself. Again, the Society did this all by themselves. No apostates are involved.
My point is that the Society does a better job of discrediting themselves than an outsider could ever hope to accomplish. We don’t need dynamite to bring them down. All we need is a spotlight.
I would like to make a suggestion. We need to make the following things available:
Media kits: These kits would each have a concise summary of one issue, such as blood transfusions, shunning, etc, as well as a list of contacts. When we see the potential for local media interest, such as when a blood issue is already making news in an area, we could send this kit to local media outlets.
Speakers bureau: A listing of persons in each region who are capable and willing to speak publicly in interviews, phone in shows, etc.
With these two tools, we could really make an impact. Any comments?