Hi everyone
This morning I woke up to a comment that had been posted on my Candace Conti YouTube video, which read:
Yeah lets all just go become Catholics or any other religion instead, they seem to handle much better. Sarcasm intended. A cover up? She was prevented from going to the authorities? I dunno guys but IMHO Wikipedia begs to differ and seems much? more objective and fair in their point of view, just Google "jehovah's witnesses sexual abuse" and check out the first link to Wikipedia. Pretty clear there is no cover up and a lot done to protect kids. I'm just sayin'.
I googled the article to see what it said, and was appalled by how biased it was. Most of it appeared to have been written by someone on the Society's writing staff.
Here is what it said originally...
Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of child sex abuse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Jehovah's Witnesses sex abuse scandal ) Jump to: navigation, search
| Part of a series on |
| Jehovah's Witnesses |
|---|
| Overview |
| Organizational structure |
| History |
| Demographics |
| Literature |
| Teaching programs |
| People |
| Watch Tower presidents |
| Formative influences |
| Notable former members |
| Opposition |
As with other religious organizations, Jehovah's Witnesses have been obliged in recent years to develop child protection policies to deal with cases of child abuse in their congregations. Details of the policy have been published in Jehovah's Witnesses' publications and press releases issued by their Office of Public Information. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Some details are found only in letters to elders which, while solely for internal use, have been made available on the Internet.
Policies
Advice to members
The Watch Tower Society, the legal entity responsible for Jehovah's Witnesses publishing, including their official doctrinal positions, has published information on how to protect children from sexual molestation, such as the articles, Protect Your Children in the October 8, 1993 edition of Awake!, Help Your Children to Thrive in Awake! of August 8, 1997, the series, Keep Your Children Safe, in the November 2007 edition of Awake!, and in the book, Learn from the Great Teacher. These articles focus on prevention, by helping children understand what sexual abuse is, to say "No" to molesters, and to tell their parents about attempted abuse. Whether or not a victim seeks professional treatment from psychiatrists, psychologists or therapists is accepted as a personal decision of the victim (or the parents) as long as the therapy does not conflict with their religious views. [ 3 ] [ 4 ]
'Two witnesses'
Jehovah's Witnesses' congregational judicial policies require the testimony of two material witnesses to establish a perpetrator's serious sin in the absence of confession, [ 5 ] based on their interpretation of scriptures such as Deuteronomy 17:6 and 1 Timothy 5:19. The organisation considers this policy to be a protection against malicious accusation of sexual assault. The Watch Tower Society's Public Information Department specifies that this two-witness policy is applied solely to congregational discipline and has no bearing on whether a crime is reported to the authorities. It is not necessary for both witnesses to have observed the same instance of child molestation to establish guilt. As of 1991, statements by two victims of separate incidents by the same perpetrator may be deemed sufficient to take action and impose internal sanctions. [ 2 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] DNA evidence, medical reports, or information from forensic experts or police that proves sexual abuse is also accepted as a valid "second witness".
In cases where there is only one eye-witness—the victim—to an allegation of child abuse, elders are instructed to monitor the accused individual closely, and in most cases suspend any conspicuous congregation duties. If there is evidence to suggest that the alleged perpetrator did abuse children, congregation duties are suspended. [ 8 ]
Questioning the victim
In instances of a child reporting abuse, elders are instructed not to ask probing or intimate questions, with elders' immediate concern to "do what they reasonably can to protect children from further abuse". [ 9 ] Elders are instructed that, however surprising the allegations, they should not indicate disbelief, nor should they criticize the complainant, [ 10 ] as elders are regarded as 'spiritual shepherds' only, and have no professional training to investigate or evaluate allegations of child abuse. Testimony based on repressed memories is not considered reliable enough to form the basis for internal action. Elders are encouraged to treat persons reporting this type of memory with kindness, but not to pursue the case unless further proof is found. They also are instructed to report possible abuse cases to the secular authorities, if they believe they should or if required by law. Abuse victims are not required to face their abuser to make an accusation; in 1998 elders were officially advised that if children are victims of molestation, they would not be required to confront the accused. [ 11 ] [ 12 ]
Congregation discipline
Jehovah's Witnesses have a disciplinary system that applies to all congregation members who commit child abuse, rather than only to members in positions of authority. [ 13 ] Their policy states that child sex victims be immediately protected from further abuse, and that abusers be prevented from finding additional victims. [ 14 ] If allegations of child abuse are deemed to have a sound basis, an internal judicial committee is formed, and the accused individual is relieved of any positions of responsibility in the congregation. Anyone found to have sexually molested a child and failing to demonstrate repentance is to be disfellowshipped from the congregation. [ 15 ] If an accused individual denies wrongdoing, but later due to evidence presented in a court of law, it is proven that he or she was involved in child abuse, the individual is disfellowshipped.
Reproof and restrictions
An abuser who is judged repentant by a committee of elders is given a 'public reproof', wherein it is announced to the congregation that the named individual "has been reproved", though the nature of their crime is not stated. [ 15 ] Such a person is immediately debarred from serving in any appointed position in the congregation, usually for life. Some time later, a talk is given to the congregation, discussing the type of sin and the need to be on guard against it; the reproved individual is not named in connection with this talk. [ 16 ] When reprimanded, sex offenders may not offer public prayers, read paragraphs during congregation studies, or be given even minor responsibilities in the congregation, such as handling microphones or distributing literature in the Kingdom Hall. According to the Watch Tower Society spokesman, J. R. Brown, sex offenders are not permitted to participate in the congregation's house-to-house preaching, unless accompanied by a responsible adult. [ 17 ] For a considerable period of time, a reproved individual is not permitted to participate in meetings by commenting in group discussions or making presentations from the platform. [ 18 ] A 1997 Watchtower article stated: "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service." [ 19 ] [ 20 ] Elders are advised to give "kindly cautions" to the abuser in regards to "not [being] alone with children," "refrain[ing] from holding children or displaying other forms of affection for them," and "not allowing children (other than his own) to spend the night in his home, not working in field service with a child, not cultivating friendships with children, and the like." [ 21 ]
Former child molesters, including those who molested children before becoming Jehovah's Witnesses, those eventually reinstated into the congregation after being disfellowshipped, and those who were deemed repentant, are subject to a number of restrictions. Commenting on the effect of these restrictions, Jehovah's Witnesses' legal representative, Mario Moreno, stated that these restrictions alert members that the individual "lacks spiritual maturity." [ 22 ] 'Privileges' may be restored to known child sex offenders if "considerable time has passed", at the discretion of local elders. [ 23 ] A fax sent by Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information to the producers of the BBC's Panorama television program stated that at least twenty years must have passed before an individual who committed an act of child sex abuse could even be considered for appointment to a responsible position in the congregation, if ever. [ 24 ]
If a former child abuser moves to another congregation, elders from the previous congregation must send a letter to the body of elders in the new congregation, outlining the offender's background [ 25 ] and whether the abuser is still under the 'restricted privileges'. Previous communication from the organization's Branch Office regarding the abuser is not forwarded to the new congregation. [ 26 ] Other members of the new congregation are not formally made aware of the abuser's past.
Positions of responsibility
When a member is recommended for a position of responsibility such as elder or ministerial servant, the individual is asked directly whether he has ever committed child sexual abuse; if it is revealed that he has, the proposed appointment is annulled and the branch office is advised. [ 27 ] If an appointed individual later admits to having committed abuse, the Watch Tower Society's policy requires that the individual be removed from their position.
The January 1, 1997 issue of The Watchtower stated, "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service." [ 28 ]
In 2010, the Watch Tower Society clarified how its policy is applied where a member in a position of authority is learned to have committed serious wrongdoing in the distant past, "more than a few years ago." The elders' handbook "Shepherd the Flock of God" explained that such a person might be allowed to remain in their position if "he has been serving faithfully for many years, has evidence of God's blessing, and has the respect of the congregation," noting that, "the nature of the sin may reflect greatly on his qualifications to serve. For example, the sin may involve past child abuse, and this would likely disqualify him for many years." It added, "If the wrongdoing occurred within the past few years while he was serving as an elder or a ministerial servant, he is disqualified from serving as such" (emphasis in original). [ 29 ]
Reporting to civil authorities
A press release issued in 2003 by Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information stated: "The elders may be required by law to report even uncorroborated or unsubstantiated allegations to the authorities. If so, we expect the elders to comply." [ 30 ] The Watchtower magazine has outlined the following policy: "Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this." [ 31 ] A 2002 memo to all congregations stated: "Our position is that secular authorities deal with crime while elders deal with sin." [ 2 ] Even where there is no mandatory reporting requirement, victims or others having knowledge of an incident of sexual abuse must not be discouraged from reporting it. [ 32 ]
The New York Times commented: [ 33 ]
The shape of the scandal [in Jehovah's Witnesses] is far different than in the Catholic church, where most of the people accused of abuse are priests and a vast majority of the victims were boys and young men. In the Jehovah's Witnesses, where congregations are often collections of extended families and church elders are chosen from among the laypeople, some of those accused are elders, but most are congregation members. The victims who have stepped forward are mostly girls and young women, and many accusations involve incest.
Congregation elders are required to first contact the organization's legal department in cases of alleged abuse to establish whether there is a legal duty to report the sex crime to the civil authorities or not. [ 34 ] In Canada, elders were advised: [ 35 ]
There is a duty to report when one has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that there is abuse or a substantial risk of abuse and parents have failed to protect the child. The report shall be made forthwith to the local child welfare authorities. […] Elders must be aware, however, that once they have knowledge, they have an obligation. They cannot just hope that someone else will report. They must follow through quickly, and be sure that it is done."
The elders' manual, Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock, states: "Though it is not the responsibility of the Christian congregation to enforce Caesar's laws, the very nature of some crimes demands that they be reported to secular authorities." [ 36 ] A 1995 memo to elders stated: "Many states make it mandatory that elders report an accusation to the proper authorities but other states do not. In those states where such is required, oftentimes the parent, the guardian, or the accused person himself can do the reporting." [ 37 ] This was publicized by 1997. [ 38 ]
In 2000, elders in Great Britain were instructed: "The elder approached must encourage the complainant to consider his or her responsibility to report the matter to the authorities without delay and should also explain that he himself might have a duty to report the matter to the proper authorities," and that "all in the Christian congregation will want to consider their personal and moral responsibility to alert the appropriate authorities in cases where a serious criminal offense of this type has been committed, or there exists a risk that one may be committed." [ 39 ] [ 40 ] In 2008, the Watch Tower Society of Britain, in discussions with the UK Charities Commission, undertook to produce a Child Protection Policy and update its procedures to bring them into line with other religious and secular bodies. [ 41 ]
Cover-up allegations
Critics claim that in many cases, members of Jehovah's Witnesses have been prevented from reporting child molestation to civil authorities. [ 42 ] [ 43 ]
Doctrinally, Jehovah's Witnesses handle all matters internally, which in recent years prompted accusations and lawsuits of a systematic sex offender cover-up. Policies sent to elders in 2002 state: [ 44 ]
Child abuse is a crime. Never suggest to anyone that they should not report an allegation of child abuse to the police or other authorities. If you are asked, make it clear that whether to report the matter to the authorities or not, is a personal decision for each individual to make and that there are no congregation sanctions for either decision. That is, no elder will criticize anyone who reports such an allegation to the authorities.
This has been the Watchtower Society's position since at least 1993, when a memo to elders stated: "It is also a personal decision if the alleged victim chooses to report such accusations to the secular authorities." [ 45 ]
Particularly since around 2000, the Jehovah's Witnesses organization has been accused of covering up cases of child molestation committed by their members. In February 2001, Christianity Today—an evangelical journal that disagrees with the theological perspective of Jehovah's Witnesses—printed an article reporting allegations that Jehovah's Witnesses' policies made reporting sexual abuse difficult for members, and did not conform to typical treatment of such cases. The article also included a response by representatives of Jehovah's Witnesses. [ 46 ]
The BBC reported on the controversy around Jehovah's Witnesses child abuse in July 2002, in an episode of Panorama entitled "Suffer the Little Children" [ 47 ] Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters published their response to many of the allegations made in the program, the substance of which is found in the article Jehovah's Witnesses and Child Protection on their official website.
According to Witness spokesman J. R. Brown, Jehovah's Witnesses are not required to report crimes to elders before calling civil authorities. Victims and their families are free to call police at will, he said, although some don't choose to. [ 48 ] A circular sent to elders in the USA stated: "In those states where such is required, oftentimes the parent, the guardian, or the accused person himself can do the reporting. In this way the confidentiality protected by ecclesiastical privilege is not violated." [ 49 ] The Watchtower Society maintains its existing policy, without an explicit requirement for elders to report all child abuse cases where such is not mandatorily required by law. [ 42 ] [ 43 ] In at least one case, elders urged a perpetrator himself to go to police. [ 50 ]
Sex offender database
The headquarters of Jehovah's Witnesses, the Watchtower Society, requires all congregations to submit details of child abuse allegations and maintains a database on all cases of child abuse reported to them. A spokesperson for the Watchtower Society stated in May 2002, "Apart from being legally needed, they have been very helpful to us in our efforts to protect the flock from harm. Christian parents can rightly feel secure in the knowledge that such efforts are made to screen out possible child abusers from appointment to responsible positions within the congregation.". [ 51 ] This database however is not shared with authorities nor can inquiries be made regarding the content of the database.
Support groups
In December 2011, a group of former Jehovah's Witnesses in Indiana began a support and information service reaching out to help those who were abused as children by members of Jehovah's Witnesses. The group initiated an information campaign calling for enforcement of "No Trespassing" signs and holding Jehovah's Witnesses accountable for trespass, as a result of child abuse allegations that have been made in Indiana. [ 52 ]
Lawsuits
In a press release dated November 21, 2007, Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information stated: [ 53 ]
In the United States, over 80,000 elders currently serve in over 12,300 congregations … During the last 100 years, only eleven elders have been sued for child abuse in thirteen lawsuits filed in the United States; In seven of these lawsuits against the elders, accusations against the Watchtower Society itself were dismissed by the courts.
In 2004, a Canadian court awarded CAD$5000 to a plaintiff for the negligence of an elder who failed to follow the official policy of the church. However, the court dismissed charges against the Watchtower Society, and directed the plaintiff to pay the Watchtower Society's legal fees amounting to CAD$142,000. [ 54 ]
In 2007 during a ground-breaking trial motion in the Napa, California court against the Watchtower Society, victims' lawyers convinced the court that 'ecclesiastical privilege' does not supersede the legal obligation of clergy to report child sex abuse to secular authorities. The Watchtower Society paid an undisclosed amount without admitting wrongdoing in an out-of-court settlement with 16 unnamed victims of alleged sexual abuse within the religion. [ 55 ] According to court documents obtained by NBC News, one plaintiff was awarded over US$780,000. [ 56 ]
Newspapers have reported that subpoenaed elders decline to testify against accused penitents, citing the confidentiality of penitent-clergy privilege. [ 57 ] However elders did not object to testifying once a specific matter of penitent-clergy privilege had been adjudicated. [ 58 ]
In June 2012, a California court ordered the Watch Tower Society to pay more than US$20 million in compensation and punitive damages to a woman who, as a child, was allegedly abused by a member. The court found that congregation elders, following the policies of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, contributed to the abuse. Lawyers for the Society said that they would appeal the ruling, calling the decision "unprecedented" and denying responsibility for abuse. [ 59 ] [ 60 ] [ 61 ] [ 62 ] In the post-trial motion, the Watch Tower Society's attorney stated in a court memorandum that no United States court has previously found its conduct or policy regarding sex abuse to be unlawful, claiming that the Watch Tower Society's reprehensibility is "very low" if any. [ 63 ] The court reduced the Watch Tower Society's total liability to US$10 million, stating that the elders as agents of the Watch Tower Society failed to disclose to other parents regarding the confession of the molester who inappropriately touched his step daughter, adding that the reprehensibility is of "medium range". [ 64 ]
As a rule I've tried to avoid getting roped into editing Wiki articles because, apart from anything else, I simply don't have the time. However, on this occasion I couldn't stand by and watch lies and distortions being told on such a sensitive issue that is close to my heart.
Here is my edited version of the article...
Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of child sex abuse
As with other religious organizations, Jehovah's Witnesses have been obliged in recent years to develop child protection policies to deal with cases of child abuse in their congregations, although critics of the Watch Tower Society, the legal entity responsible for Jehovah's Witnesses publishing, claim their existing policies violate "basic principles of community responsibility." [ 1 ] Such critics point to the 2012 Candace Conti verdict as evidence of this. [ 2 ]
Details of the Society's child abuse policies have been published in Jehovah's Witnesses' publications, although more specific guidelines are made available to elders, or on request. Press releases issued by the Watch Tower Society's Office of Public Information confirm that if a person accused of molestation repeatedly denies the charges of his victim, and there is no other witness to the incident, "the elders cannot take action within the congregation at that time." [ 3 ] [ 4 ] In recent times, the Society has faced accusations that it is cultivating a culture of secrecy surrounding its policies after one letter intended solely for elders was made available on the Internet, only to be later removed after legal action was threatened by the Society. [ 5 ]
Policies
Advice to members
The Watch Tower Society has published information on how to protect children from sexual molestation, such as the articles, Protect Your Children in the October 8, 1993 edition of Awake!, Help Your Children to Thrive in Awake! of August 8, 1997, the series, Keep Your Children Safe, in the November 2007 edition of Awake!, and in the book, Learn from the Great Teacher. However, these articles focus on prevention, and do not specifically state that a child or its parents should contact the police in the event of molestation. They even suggest that, in some lands, "the legal system may offer little hope of successful prosecution." Whether or not a victim seeks professional treatment from psychiatrists, psychologists or therapists is suggested as being the personal decision of the victim (or the parents), but such ones are warned to "make sure that any such professional will respect your religious views." [ 6 ] [ 7 ]
'Two witnesses'
Jehovah's Witnesses' congregational judicial policies require the testimony of two material witnesses to establish a perpetrator's serious sin in the absence of confession, [ 8 ] based on their interpretation of scriptures such as Deuteronomy 17:6 and 1 Timothy 5:19. The organization considers this policy to be a protection against malicious accusations of sexual assault. The Watch Tower Society's Public Information Department maintains that this two-witness policy is applied solely to congregational discipline and has no bearing on whether a crime is reported to the authorities. However, critics argue that by failing to insist that authorities should be contacted in all instances, the Society allows the potential for some pedophiles to escape investigation.
The Society also argues that it is not necessary for both witnesses to have observed the same instance of child molestation to establish guilt. As of 1991, statements by two victims of separate incidents by the same perpetrator may be deemed sufficient to take action and impose internal sanctions. [ 4 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] However, critics argue that such an approach to determining guilt overlooks the seriousness of the initial abuse, and effectively allows a pedophile to go unpunished until he or she abuses a second child. DNA evidence, medical reports, or information from forensic experts or police that proves sexual abuse is also accepted as a valid "second witness," however critics argue that, without mandatory reporting for all accusations of abuse regardless of the local laws, such evidence could potentially never be gathered in the first place.
In cases where there is only one eye-witness—the victim—to an allegation of child abuse, elders may monitor the accused individual closely, or even suspend any conspicuous congregation duties - but only if there is evidence based on the testimony of more than one witness to suggest that the alleged perpetrator has abused children. [ 11 ] In some instances where there is only one Witness to molestation, elders may discreetly inform parents in a congregation not to allow their children to spend time with someone accused of child abuse provided such a person has been deemed a "predator" by the local branch office based on the elders' observations. [ 12 ]
Questioning the victim
In instances of a child reporting abuse, elders are instructed to not ask probing or intimate questions, with elders' immediate concern to "do what they reasonably can to protect children from further abuse". [ 13 ] Elders are instructed that, however surprising the allegations, they should not indicate disbelief, nor should they criticize the complainant, [ 14 ] as elders are regarded as 'spiritual shepherds' only, and have no professional training to investigate or evaluate allegations of child abuse. Testimony based on repressed memories is not considered reliable enough to form the basis for internal action. Elders are encouraged to treat persons reporting this type of memory with kindness, but not to pursue the case unless further proof is found. They also are required to report alleged abuse cases to the secular authorities, but only if instructed to do so by the local branch or depending on the local laws. Abuse victims may be required to face their abuser to make an accusation, as stated on the Society's official website: "If the accused denies the charge, the two elders may arrange for him and the victim to restate their position in each other’s presence, with elders also there." [ 15 ]
Congregation discipline
Jehovah's Witnesses have a disciplinary system that applies to all congregation members who commit child abuse, rather than only to members in positions of authority. [ 16 ] Their policy states that child sex victims be immediately protected from further abuse, and that abusers convicted under the 'two witnesses' rule be prevented from finding additional victims. [ 17 ] If allegations of child abuse are deemed to have a sound basis, satisfying the organization's religious tenets, an internal judicial committee is formed, and the accused individual may potentially be relieved of positions of responsibility in the congregation. Anyone found to have sexually molested a child and failing to demonstrate repentance is to be disfellowshipped from the congregation. [ 18 ] If an accused individual denies wrongdoing, but later due to evidence presented in a court of law, it is proven that he or she was involved in child abuse, the individual is disfellowshipped.
Reproof and restrictions
An abuser who is judged repentant by a committee of elders is given a 'public reproof', wherein it is announced to the congregation that the named individual "has been reproved", though the nature of their crime is not stated. [ 18 ] Such a person is automatically debarred from serving in any appointed position in the congregation, however privileges can be restored in the future depending on whether he or she is deemed by the branch office to be a "known molester." [ 19 ] Some time later, a talk may be given to the congregation, discussing the type of sin and the need to be on guard against it, but the reproved individual is not named in connection with this talk. [ 20 ] When reprimanded, sex offenders may not offer public prayers, read paragraphs during congregation studies, or be given even minor responsibilities in the congregation, such as handling microphones or distributing literature in the Kingdom Hall.
Sex offenders are still permitted to participate in the congregation's house-to-house preaching. According to the Watch Tower Society spokesman, J. R. Brown, such ones are only allowed to preach when accompanied by a responsible adult. [ 21 ] However, critics argue that the responsible adult assigned to work with such an individual, if not an elder, would be oblivious to the fact that he or she is a pedophile, meaning they would not be in a position to offer protection to members of the public.
For a considerable period of time, a reproved individual is not permitted to participate in meetings by commenting in group discussions or making presentations from the platform. [ 22 ] A 1997 Watchtower article stated: "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service." [ 23 ] [ 24 ] Elders are advised to give "kindly cautions" to the abuser in regards to "not [being] alone with children," "refrain[ing] from holding children or displaying other forms of affection for them," and "not allowing children (other than his own) to spend the night in his home, not working in field service with a child, not cultivating friendships with children, and the like." [ 25 ]
Former child molesters, including those who molested children before becoming Jehovah's Witnesses, those eventually reinstated into the congregation after being disfellowshipped, and those who were deemed repentant, are subject to a number of restrictions. Commenting on the effect of these restrictions, Jehovah's Witnesses' legal representative, Mario Moreno, stated that these restrictions alert members that the individual "lacks spiritual maturity." [ 26 ] 'Privileges' may be restored to known child sex offenders if "considerable time has passed", at the discretion of local elders. [ 27 ] A fax sent by Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information to the producers of the BBC's Panorama television program stated that at least twenty years must have passed before an individual who committed an act of child sex abuse could even be considered for appointment to a responsible position in the congregation, if ever. [ 28 ]
If a former child abuser moves to another congregation, elders from the previous congregation must send a letter to the body of elders in the new congregation, outlining the offender's background [ 29 ] and whether the abuser is still under the 'restricted privileges'. Previous communication from the organization's Branch Office regarding the abuser is not forwarded to the new congregation. [ 30 ] Other members of the new congregation are not made aware of the abuser's past.
Positions of responsibility
When a member is recommended for a position of responsibility such as elder or ministerial servant, the individual is asked directly whether he has ever committed child sexual abuse; if it is revealed that he has, the proposed appointment is annulled and the branch office is advised. [ 31 ] It is therefore left to the candidate to admit whether he has previously abused children or not. If an appointed individual later admits to having committed abuse, the Watch Tower Society's policy requires that the individual be removed from their position.
The January 1, 1997 issue of The Watchtower stated, "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service." [ 32 ] However, whether or not a child abuser is deemed a "known molester" is left to the discretion of the local branch. The October 1, 2012 letter to elders states, "the branch office, not the local body of elders, determines whether one who has sexually abused a child is considered a known child molester" and adds, "It cannot be said in every case that one who has sexually abused a child could never qualify for privileges of service in the congregation." [ 33 ]
In 2010, the Watch Tower Society clarified how its policy is applied where a member in a position of authority is learned to have committed serious wrongdoing in the distant past, "more than a few years ago." The elders' handbook "Shepherd the Flock of God" explained that such a person might be allowed to remain in their position if "he has been serving faithfully for many years, has evidence of God's blessing, and has the respect of the congregation," noting that, "the nature of the sin may reflect greatly on his qualifications to serve. For example, the sin may involve past child abuse, and this would likely disqualify him for many years." It added, "If the wrongdoing occurred within the past few years while he was serving as an elder or a ministerial servant, he is disqualified from serving as such" (emphasis in original). [ 34 ]
Reporting to civil authorities
A press release issued in 2003 by Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information stated: "The elders may be required by law to report even uncorroborated or unsubstantiated allegations to the authorities. If so, we expect the elders to comply." [ 35 ] The Watchtower magazine has outlined the following policy: "Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this." [ 36 ] A 2002 memo to all congregations stated: "Our position is that secular authorities deal with crime while elders deal with sin." [ 4 ] Even where there is no mandatory reporting requirement, victims or others having knowledge of an incident of sexual abuse must not be discouraged from reporting it. [ 37 ] Critics argue that not discouraging reporting is not the same as encouraging it. Their position is that the Society's approach to child abuse as a sin first-and-foremost potentially inhibits criminal investigation, particularly in the Society's insistence that elders should contact the branch office before speaking to the authorities. They insist that it, if child abuse is truly to be considered a crime, it is best to involve the authorities immediately whenever it is alleged to have been committed, with judicial issues being resolved later. [ 1 ]
The New York Times commented: [ 38 ]
The shape of the scandal [in Jehovah's Witnesses] is far different than in the Catholic church, where most of the people accused of abuse are priests and a vast majority of the victims were boys and young men. In the Jehovah's Witnesses, where congregations are often collections of extended families and church elders are chosen from among the laypeople, some of those accused are elders, but most are congregation members. The victims who have stepped forward are mostly girls and young women, and many accusations involve incest.
Congregation elders are required to first contact the organization's legal department in cases of alleged abuse to establish whether there is a legal duty to report the sex crime to the civil authorities or not. [ 39 ] In Canada, elders were advised: [ 40 ]
There is a duty to report when one has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that there is abuse or a substantial risk of abuse and parents have failed to protect the child. The report shall be made forthwith to the local child welfare authorities. […] Elders must be aware, however, that once they have knowledge, they have an obligation. They cannot just hope that someone else will report. They must follow through quickly, and be sure that it is done."
The elders' manual, Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock (no longer in use), states: "Though it is not the responsibility of the Christian congregation to enforce Caesar's laws, the very nature of some crimes demands that they be reported to secular authorities." [ 41 ] A 1995 memo to elders stated: "Many states make it mandatory that elders report an accusation to the proper authorities but other states do not. In those states where such is required, oftentimes the parent, the guardian, or the accused person himself can do the reporting." [ 42 ] This stance was made public on the Society's official website in 1997, although the website in question has since been replaced by JW.org. [ 43 ] [ 44 ]
Country-specific reporting rules for the UK
In 2000, elders in Great Britain were instructed that an elder's advice in the wake of a child abuse accusation "should always include advising the complainant that the congregation cannot take over the God-given responsibility of the ‘superior authorities’ in dealing with crime." The letter went on to add: "Accordingly, the complainant should consider his or her responsibility to report the matter to the authorities without delay. (Compare Romans 13:4, James 4:17) Such authorities might include the family doctor, the head teacher of the child’s school, the social services, the NSPCC, or the police. The elder should explain to the complainant that he himself might have a duty to report the matter to the proper authorities." [ 45 ] [ 46 ]
In 2008, the Watch Tower Society of Britain, in discussions with the UK Charities Commission, undertook to produce a Child Protection Policy and update its procedures to bring them into line with other religious and secular bodies. [ 47 ] This Child Protection Policy is available for congregation members to view, but only on request.
Cover-up allegations
Critics claim that in many cases, members of Jehovah's Witnesses have been prevented from reporting child molestation to civil authorities. [ 48 ] [ 49 ]
Doctrinally, Jehovah's Witnesses handle all matters internally, which in recent years prompted accusations and lawsuits of a systematic sex offender cover-up. Policies sent to elders in 2002 state: [ 50 ]
Child abuse is a crime. Never suggest to anyone that they should not report an allegation of child abuse to the police or other authorities. If you are asked, make it clear that whether to report the matter to the authorities or not, is a personal decision for each individual to make and that there are no congregation sanctions for either decision. That is, no elder will criticize anyone who reports such an allegation to the authorities.
This has been the Watchtower Society's position since 1993, when a memo to elders stated: "It is also a personal decision if the alleged victim chooses to report such accusations to the secular authorities." [ 51 ] However, critics maintain that not dissuading victims from approaching the police differs significantly from encouraging them to do so in all such cases. [ 1 ]
Particularly since around 2000, the Jehovah's Witnesses organization has been accused of covering up cases of child molestation committed by their members. In February 2001, Christianity Today—an evangelical journal that disagrees with the theological perspective of Jehovah's Witnesses—printed an article reporting allegations that Jehovah's Witnesses' policies made reporting sexual abuse difficult for members, and did not conform to typical treatment of such cases. The article also included a response by representatives of Jehovah's Witnesses. [ 52 ]
The BBC reported on the controversy around Jehovah's Witnesses child abuse in July 2002, in an episode of Panorama entitled "Suffer the Little Children" [ 53 ] Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters published their response to many of the allegations made in the program, the substance of which is found in an article Jehovah's Witnesses and Child Protection on their official website.
According to Witness spokesman J. R. Brown, Jehovah's Witnesses are not required to report crimes to elders before calling civil authorities. Victims and their families are free to call police at will, he said, although some don't choose to. [ 54 ] However, this position has yet to be stated clearly in the Society's literature. Furthermore, critics argue that Jehovah's Witnesses often approach elders first through fear of facing repercussions for taking their brother to court according to the Bible's counsel at 1 Corinthians 6:1-7.
A circular sent to elders in the USA stated: "In those states where such is required, oftentimes the parent, the guardian, or the accused person himself can do the reporting. In this way the confidentiality protected by ecclesiastical privilege is not violated." [ 55 ] The Watchtower Society maintains its existing policy, without an explicit requirement for elders to report all child abuse cases where such is not mandatorily required by law. [ 48 ] [ 49 ] In one case, elders urged a perpetrator himself to go to police. [ 56 ] However, in their official guidelines, elders are instructed to "leave matters in Jehovah's hands" if an abuser denies the accusations and there is no second witness to hand. [ 57 ] [ 58 ]
Sex offender database
The headquarters of Jehovah's Witnesses, the Watchtower Society, requires all congregations to submit details of child abuse allegations and maintains a database on all cases of child abuse reported to them. A spokesperson for the Watchtower Society stated in May 2002, "Apart from being legally needed, they have been very helpful to us in our efforts to protect the flock from harm. Christian parents can rightly feel secure in the knowledge that such efforts are made to screen out possible child abusers from appointment to responsible positions within the congregation.". [ 59 ] This database however is not shared with authorities, nor can inquiries be made regarding the contents of the database. Critics argue that its very existence represents an effort to shield pedophiles from the authorities. In July 2012 the hacktivist group Anonymous threatened to hack into the database and make its contents public, but they have yet to produce any evidence of having done so. [ 60 ]
Support groups
In December 2011, a group of former Jehovah's Witnesses in Indiana began a support and information service reaching out to help those who were abused as children by members of Jehovah's Witnesses. The group initiated an information campaign calling for enforcement of "No Trespassing" signs and holding Jehovah's Witnesses accountable for trespass, as a result of child abuse allegations that have been made in Indiana. [ 61 ]
Lawsuits
In a press release dated November 21, 2007, Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information stated: [ 62 ]
In the United States, over 80,000 elders currently serve in over 12,300 congregations … During the last 100 years, only eleven elders have been sued for child abuse in thirteen lawsuits filed in the United States; In seven of these lawsuits against the elders, accusations against the Watchtower Society itself were dismissed by the courts.
In 2004, a Canadian court awarded CAD$5000 to a plaintiff for the negligence of an elder who failed to follow the official policy of the church. However, the court dismissed charges against the Watchtower Society, and directed the plaintiff to pay the Watchtower Society's legal fees amounting to CAD$142,000. [ 63 ]
In 2007 during a ground-breaking trial motion in the Napa, California court against the Watchtower Society, victims' lawyers convinced the court that 'ecclesiastical privilege' does not supersede the legal obligation of clergy to report child sex abuse to secular authorities. The Watchtower Society paid an undisclosed amount without admitting wrongdoing in an out-of-court settlement with 16 unnamed victims of alleged sexual abuse within the religion. [ 64 ] According to court documents obtained by NBC News, one plaintiff was awarded over US$780,000. [ 65 ]
Newspapers have reported that subpoenaed elders decline to testify against accused penitents, citing the confidentiality of penitent-clergy privilege. [ 66 ] However elders did not object to testifying once a specific matter of penitent-clergy privilege had been adjudicated. [ 67 ]
In June 2012, a California court ordered the Watch Tower Society to pay more than US$20 million in compensation and punitive damages to a woman who, as a child, was allegedly abused by a member. The court found that congregation elders, following the policies of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, contributed to the abuse. Lawyers for the Society said that they would appeal the ruling, calling the decision "unprecedented" and denying responsibility for abuse. [ 68 ] [ 69 ] [ 70 ] [ 71 ] In the post-trial motion, the Watch Tower Society's attorney stated in a court memorandum that no United States court has previously found its conduct or policy regarding sex abuse to be unlawful, claiming that the Watch Tower Society's reprehensibility is "very low" if any. [ 72 ] The court reduced the Watch Tower Society's total liability to US$10 million, stating that the elders as agents of the Watch Tower Society failed to disclose to other parents regarding the confession of the molester who inappropriately touched his step daughter, adding that the reprehensibility is of "medium range". [ 73 ]
It remains to be seen whether Wiki accepts my edits. I have implored them to do so, saying in my comment to them: " Please consider my edits carefully. I am a former JW elder, and the founder of JWsurvey.org. Much of the information published on this article is heavily biased towards defending the Watch Tower Society. I leave it in your capable hands to decide. "
The whole editing process has taken me half a day. Even though I don't view it as wasted time if I am allowed to refute Watchtower propaganda, it is still extremely frustrating that I have to set aside quite so much time to get the real truth out there. If my edits are completely rejected, I may well boycott Wikipedia from this point on.
I will say this though, I learned two things from editing the Watchtower article that I didn't know before...
- A December 2000 letter permitted elders in the UK to inform parents of their rights to report their accusations to the authorities. This is news to me and highly welcomed. It's a relief to know that, if anything happened to my young relatives in the UK, elders are at least instructed to tell the parents that it is their responsibility to notify the authorities. However, even though my British relatives benefit from this country-specific rule, those in other parts of the world aren't so fortunate. For that reason, I sectioned off the paragraph with the sub-heading "Country-specific reporting rules for the UK" to highlight that these rules are the exception rather than the norm.
- The Society actually admitted to the BBC that its pedophile database exists. It stated in a 2002 fax: "Apart from being legally needed, [details of child abuse allegations] have been very helpful to us in our efforts to protect the flock from harm. Christian parents can rightly feel secure in the knowledge that such efforts are made to screen out possible child abusers from appointment to responsible positions within the congregation." I previously assumed the existence of the database was contended, but apparently this is not the case.
So even if my edits aren't accepted, maybe it wasn't a total waste.
Cedars
