So by that way of rationalizing it...
Ted Bundy should have been set free if he just made the necessary steps to never murder and rape again.
Bernie Madoff should go free if he promise never to run another Ponzi scheme.
The guy that molested me as a youth and thereafter many of my cousins and his own step-children should have his name taken off the sex offender role and his record absolved.
I don't suppose you've missed the point on purose, so let me clarify what I said. You asserted that our view of the Catholic Church and the Watchtower should be the same because both organizations "aided and abetted the sexual abuse of children. I point out that the responses have been quite different from the two organizations -- much overdue in the Catholic case, but ultimately quite strong. I also pointed out that I don't know anyone who thinks the bishops who protected bad priests should get a pass.
I hope you can see now that I haven't said anything at all that justifies your characterization. What I have done is point out a significant difference between the two organizations in the way this was ultimately handled and the level of seriousness which, finally, the Catholics have addressed the question. I haven't justified the delay in these developments.
There are JW apologists who feel similarly about the reforms made by the Wt. Leaders and claim now everything is set right, relax God is in charge again. They find it difficult if not impossible to fathom that the sky-god the product of one's imagination and they were simple bowing to civic pressure to make necessary changes.
Well, designs, I don't know whether these changes have been made or not. What I can say is that the VIRTUS program seems quite robust and is commonly consulted by other organizations who also understand the risks associated with young people working closely with adults. These reforms would almost certainly not have been made absent the media coverage about the issue. That does not change the fact that changes seem to have been made that are qualitatively better than the changes the JWs have made or, for that matter, the policy changes we fail to see in the "civic" school system, which has some stories to tell of its own.
Again, as I have to point out on a board that is defined by a pride in its bad faith arguments, I don't justify or minimize the badness of what happened. But the question was asked how the Catholics differ from the JWs. This is part of the answer.
So a xJW who sees the terrible position the Wt. Leadership took in the Conti case and other such cases trying to protect the 'good name of the church' and writes and speaks out about it, if they have converted to Catholicism should they put blinders on with the criminal cases now moving to prosecution phases in the world's courts against your favored Church.
How to put this? No, they should not put blinders on. Not sure when I advocated putting blinders on, actually. Mahoney, in Los Angeles, for example, seems to have been quite the bastard -- hiding priests accused of molestation or other improper behavior in Mexico, for Christ's sake!
But if there are similarities between what the Catholic Church and the JWs did -- and again, there are -- it turns out there are also differences. At the same time, if you are searching for institutions that you can trust when it comes to this sort of thing, plan to be disappointed: is seems institutions have an ability to hide bad shit at all cost. The most naïve among us are shocked -- shocked! -- when they find the girls lacrosse coach is fucking the girls lacrosse team, or when they find Father Friendly is getting blow jobs from altar boys, or when they find out that the Ministerial Servant who takes a real interest in the kids has a computer filled with video of the kids masturbating while he watches.
Like, no shit. Doesn't everybody know that a quite small percentage of adults who work with young people take advantage of them? And doesn't everybody know that almost every single organization will find a way to protect the abusers as a way to protect itself? Haven't we learned this by now?
So what matters is creating institutional structures that prevent organizations from operating this way. The Church has implemented a set of procedures that look promising -- at least promising enough that other organizations seem interested in borrowing those procedures. Will it be enough? I don't know.
With 30,000 pages of documents against Cardinal Mahoney in the Los Angeles Archdiocese alone he is without reservation or censur from the exiting Pope allowed to vote in the next Pope, he is in Rome at this very moment. What message to the kids who had their innocence robbed from them, what message is that.
Pretty fucking bad. But Mahoney is a piece of shit and this is how you expect a piece of shit to act, isn't it? But Cardinals aren't like VPs in a multinational and the Pope can't just fire them whenever he feels like it. There is this huge process because the Popes have not always been nice guys themselves and because there is this idea that the bishops are in charge of their own cities. It's like a schoolteacher with tenure -- they have due process rights that can take a lot of time to work through. So, yeah, Mahoney outta stay the fuck out, but when he was taking victory laps for all his lefty political viewpoints, I guess it made him think he was above all that.