david_10 said: Anyway, I still don't know what to think of a Witness homeowner getting his house fixed for free and then keeping all the money.
ADCMS: I re-read your post. I think in one way you are acknowledging an obvious scam in the way WT has handled matters with disaster relief. On the other hand, you take issue with a point no one here was advocating and you mentioned it twice in your post i.e. that JWs should keep their insurance check while receiving free help. Not one person commenting on this topic even remotely suggested a JW homeowner should profit from receiving disaster aid. Your comments were somewhat self-contradictory.
Are you related to TheOldHippie by any chance?
david_10 said: No, ADCMS, I've never met him, although he doesn't seem like such a bad person to me
ADCMS: again, you object to a fictitious point I never raised.
I questioned OldHippie's logic and the fact that he/she seemed to miss the whole point of the discussion, but never once did I say or infer anything negative about OldHippie's character. He/she is probably a nice person....but I didn't comment on that in my posts either, so bringing it up is a misdirection.
OldHippie was dismissing eye-witness accounts of what's been observed Re: Assembly Hall "rent" scams and disaster relief scams and came across as a WT apologist. The points OH raised as a defense of WT tactics were without basis in logic or fact. I was correcting those incorrect views.
I got the impression that neither you nor OldHippie read the various posts very carefully, because you drew conclusions that had nothing to do with any of the comments made. I was trying to dial you both back into the discussion, nothing more. If my comments came across differently than that, then I apologize.