Simon, why would someone lock the thread when there was more to be said about the AAWA contraversy? Sure, Cedars would have loved to close the thread down like a child who yell's (I got the last word or it's my ball and I am outta here!) but why close it? To engage in conversations and debates is not evil when alternative explanations or points of view need to surface. I am glad you opened up a "closed thread" to allow the conversation to finish its eventual destination.
I think this shows how dynamic JWN and ExJW dialogue is, we are not so paranoid and weak we try to cover up mistakes and shine the light on another's erroneous thinkings or deeds. We are no better than The Tower if refuse to accept criticism or critcal remarks about our method of opperations. The scientific community is not above reproach if their theories and gadgets are a miserable failure, so it is with us, if we are to be a better agency than that which we left behind, we need to embrace any good constructive criticism, otherwise we are nothing more than a Bizzarro version of the Watchtower Organization which embraces "fear, group shunnings, half-truths, theocratic lying, and education on how to improve the Whole. Thank's Simon for taking us above our begining and allowing everything to be examined no matter where the cards drop! Your a good brother!
"
Just to be clear so there are no misunderstandings on what happened ... Cedars posted a kind of 'wrap up' post to the original AAWA topic basically declaring it finished and the topic was locked shortly after. I didn't know why it had been locked and there was no reason that it needed to be locked. Therefore, I unlocked it with a comment to that effect. Normally, when something like that happens and there is any debate about the decision it's done in admin. Instead Lady Lee posted publicly that it was locked because Cedars had asked her to lock it, and then locked it again. That was when I made it clear more pointedly that the topic should not be locked and that Cedars was not a moderator of this site and the moderation should be done according to this sites rules, not at the bidding of the AAWA. "Subsequently, and privately, I suggested that it would be better if she hold off moderating on AAWA related topics so there wouldn't be any conflict of interest or the appearance of it. This was so she wouldn't be put in a difficult position of them asking her to take actions on the site that obviously didn't fit with this site's rules. I didn't suggest she chould not post on AAWA topics if she chose to though.(underline mine) "I am surprised and disappointed in the nature of her resignation. I think it was probably orchestrated somewhat and the 'reasoning' is a little twisted and confusing IMO but it is what it is and we move on. JWN will thrive I'm sure. It's always been bigger than any individual moderator or any site owner, it's the sum of all the people on it who come together to make it what it is. |