Some nicely illustrated heart foreskins being peeled away would have made an interesting project for the WT art department they could have used up a whole page with the illustration:).
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 05-12-2013 WT Study (HEART)
by blondie 33 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
BU2B
Its Ironic because they speak of an uncircumsized heart being insensitive, when in reality real circumcision dulls sensitivity in the penis while uncircumsized ones are more sensitive. So its not even an accurate paralell.
-
JW GoneBad
Not to get too terribly graphic, but because the expression 'uncircumcised in heart' was used in the article numerous times, perhaps a before and after illustrated male circumcised sex organ with the foreskin (signifying the bad fig) laying to one side may have been helpful next to the illustrations of the cheating JW brother/husband.
-
frankiespeakin
Bu,
Its Ironic because they speak of an uncircumsized heart being insensitive, when in reality real circumcision dulls sensitivity in the penis while uncircumsized ones are more sensitive. So its not even an accurate paralell.
Probably because these writers are so represses sexually they have little knowledge of this fact or anything penis/virgina/breast related, its just a thing that hangs down between their legs that should not be touched lest they offend Jehovah and looking at a picture of one is forbidden.