Does 'TRUTH' change? Came across this gem....

by Newly Enlightened 11 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Newly Enlightened
    Newly Enlightened

    When I was looking for a quote for Data-dog's topic.... WT 1966 10/1 pg 607-608

    Questions FromReaders ?

    At times there are changes in viewpoint on Biblical subjects discussed in the Watch Tower Society’s publications. We speak of what we believe as “the truth.” But does“truth”change?—W.P.,U.S.A.

    Really it is the Bible that speaks of beliefs that are in harmony with the Scriptures as “the truth.” At 2 Peter 2:2 the worship based on such beliefs is termed “the way of the truth.” Yet concerning that “way of the truth” we read at Proverbs 4:18: “The path of the righteous ones is like the bright light that is getting lighter and lighter until the day is firmly established.” So we do not know all there is to know. In fact, even when the post-Armageddon system of things is ushered in we will not know everything. Throughout all eternity there will always be more to learn. This is indicated by what the apostle Paul wrote in Romans 11:33: “O the depth of God’s riches and wisdom and knowledge! How unsearchable his judgments are and past tracing out his ways are!”

    It is to be expected, then, that at times there may be changes in viewpoint. Our basic belief may be sound Scriptural truth, but there may be some details that we did not fully understand in the past. In time, with the aid of Jehovah’s spirit, we get those matters cleared up.

    For example, a few years ago we had a fine series of articles in TheWatchtower on the “superior authorities.” (Issues of November 1–December 1, 1962) Before those articles were published, we knew and taught that Jehovah is the Most High, and that Jesus Christ is the second to Him in power and authority. We knew that we should be law-abiding persons, but that, when there was a conflict between man’s law and that of God, we would obey God as ruler rather than men. Those basic truths are the same today as they were before; they have not changed. However, by careful scrutiny of the Scriptures we have come to appreciate that certain Bible texts ought to be applied in a different way. For example, we realized that the “superior authorities” mentioned in Romans 13:1 are, not Jehovah God and Jesus Christ, but the political rulers. That is also true of Titus 3:1 and 1 Peter 2:13, 14. Yet the basic truth is unchanged. Our viewpoint toward God and toward the State is the same as before.

    Similarly with our study of the resurrection. We believed in the resurrection of the dead before our recent series of Watchtower articles (issues of January 15–March 15, 1965) on the subject and we believe in it now. We also believed that 144,000 would be raised to heavenly life with Christ. We believed that many more would be resurrected as humans; that some of them would be persons who had faithfully served God in the past, and that others would be those who had lived ‘unrighteously.’ We also believed that a great educational work would take place when they would be raised. Those truths have not changed. But now we see that, according to the Scriptures, more are to return than we expected. So, rather than setting aside the truth of the resurrection, it has been magnified, and our appreciation of Jehovah’s love and mercy in providing for the resurrection has been enhanced.

    This is in direct contrast to what occurred among certain men of whom the apostle Paul wrote to Timothy, as recorded at 2 Timothy 2:18: “These very men have deviated from the truth, saying that the resurrection has already occurred; and they are subverting the faith of some.” Those men no longer had any hope in the resurrection; they believed that what was in the past was all there was to it. But they were setting aside the truth that Jesus had taught. Likewise in Christendom there have been changes in viewpoint; but they are rejecting the Bible as myth and setting aside its moral code as out-of-date.

    What a tremendous difference between what is taking place among them and what Jehovah is doing for his people in order to bring our thinking even more closely in line with his inspired Word of truth!

  • AndDontCallMeShirley
    AndDontCallMeShirley

    This WT statement above regarding the identity of the "superior authorities" mentioned in Rom. 13 is very misleading. It makes it appear that the WT Society had a misunderstanding up to 1962(which it did) then corrected it to the current view (that the superior authorities are secular governments).

    What the article does not mention is that CT Russell had the correct view, but Rutherford changed the teaching and said the "superior authorities" are God and Jesus-which was a completely false interpretation. The WT then spent the next two decades condemning the 'misguided' churches of Christendom that taught the SA are secular governments, NOT God and Jesus.

    In typical WT fashion, it makes a doctrinal circle, coming all the way back to an original viewpoint while teaching error for decades, then declares the 'revised' doctrine "new light" and "progress".

    So, a question to be asked is this: why did the churches of Christendom always have the correct understanding of Rom. 13 and never once wavered in their view, while WT-supposedly god's one and only true religion, the only religion with correct Biblical guidance, flip-flop on their view many times? Which makes the following quote quite absurd:

    "At times explanations given by Jehovah’s visible organization have shown adjustments, seemingly to previous points of view. But this has not actually been the case." The Watchtower, December 1, 1981, p. 27

    In WT mentality it can completely change its views many, many times, views that are usually blatantly contradictory to each other, yet WT says it only "seems" that it has changed its view.

    Who are the ‘Higher Powers' mentioned at Romans 13:1

    Russell taught that the "Superior Authorities" refer to governments

    Rutherford taught that the "Superior Authorities" refer to Jehovah and Jesus

    in 1961 the WTS reverted back to Russel's original teaching on the "superior authorities"

    1916 - 'Higher powers' refers to governments.

    1943 - 'Higher powers' refers to Jehovah God & Jesus Christ.

    W 6/15/52, p.375 refers to Jehovah and Jesus

    W 11/15/61 refers to governments

    W 11/15/62, p. 683 refers to governments

    1964 - 'Higher powers' refers to governments.

  • Newly Enlightened
    Newly Enlightened

    Thank you ADCMS: And how can they call that 'Truth' when it flip-flops like a fish out of water?

  • AndDontCallMeShirley
    AndDontCallMeShirley

    So, if as the WT claims, its publications are the result of God and his Holy Spirit telling them what to print as "truth", why can they have views that are completely at odds with previous views and always being changed? truth does not change- new information only enhances the underlying truth-it never replaces it.

    "We will also increase our joy if we prayerfully and diligently study God's spirit - inspired Word and Christian publications prepared under the spirit's guidance." Watchtower 1992 Mar 15 pp.21-22

    w81 12/1 p.31 par.20 ThePathoftheRighteousDoesKeepGettingBrighter

    Favored indeed are all those who serve loyally with the "faithful and discreet slave" organization, Jehovah’s visible agent of communication!

  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    It is to be expected, then, that at times there may be changes in viewpoint.

    So now I get it, I wasn't disfellowshipped and subsequently shunned by my family and former friends for disagreeing with and breaking Bible truth, but a changeable WT viewpoint.

    I feel so much better now.

    I'm glad that's all cleared up!

  • Newly Enlightened
    Newly Enlightened

    Right! See. Just like 32 yrs ago RayFranz and all those at Bethel were kicked out for believing one way, which was against WT at the time, but now 32 yrs later it's being accepted as 'new light' in the new July WT

  • Captain Blithering
    Captain Blithering

    Marking for future quotage...

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Oubliette,

    Is that true? I am really sorry. I may be joining you soon. I asked an really nice Elder about persons who are DF'd over not accepting teachings. I asked, " So what if someone get's df'd because they say something is true years before it is the " current light ", will you track them down and apologize and reinstate them?" " Well, we should", he said. I think he meant it. Then he said that in the new world we won't care. If we see Brother Doubter who was DF'd for 30 years over a doctrinal matter, we will just be glad to see them! No harm, no foul I guess!?

  • trujw
    trujw

    It reminds me of merry go round by Keith sweat. Yeah he was big when I was in high school.

  • smiddy
    smiddy

    ADCMS

    smiddy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit