by cantleave 21 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Science has already documented and proved they cant date the earth millions of years.
I think you are referring to the mis-dating of lava flows due to innaccurate and misleading sampling to a lab undertaking the wrong methodology.
If not please submit your evidence.
I think you are referring to the mis-dating of lava flows due to innaccurate and misleading sampling to a lab undertaking the wrong methodology
In science isn't that what they call a double blind test?
James Brown, how old do you believe the earth is?
Did dinosaurs and humans coexist?
Were there any dinosaurs on the ark?
When you understand the methodology.
You will understand that you are using circular reasoning.
Here we go again...
CERFULARREASONING!!!
Thanks for an intersting post cantleave.
James Brown is becoming a caricature of the willful ignorance of creationists. He doesn't understand the first thing about it but he's against it anyway.
I had a conversation with a deacon from my old church last week. He said to me "I don't have to read any books to know that evolution is wrong".
There is no arguing with that sort of silliness.
James Brown, how old do you believe the earth is?
Did dinosaurs and humans coexist?
Where there any dinosaurs on the ark?
How old do I believe the earth is? If I was a college professor and wanted to keep my job I would answer
4.5 billion years. People that believe the bible think it is less than 10,000 years old.
There is no easily understood clear cut answer to the question. Both answers require faith and circular
reasoning which is not scientific.
From the evidence I see I believe its possible dinosaurs and humans coexisted, they were called dragons.
If there was an ark.
I believe there were baby dinosaurs on the ark..
I am aware of alternate theories for mans origins.
The radiometric dating methods and circular reasoning is a major flaw.
If there is/was no god then atheism is the ticket.
Still there circular dating methods are faulty.
I guess it's the best the atheist can do.
Even if I were to embrace atheism I would have to say there is a problem with the dating methods of the earth.
It might be a correct guess but it is not scientific and repeatable and doesnt stand up to double blind test.
I guess I woke cofty. He smells this sort of stuff.
I feel the same way about him as he does about me.
Just change a few words eg creationist for atheist.
Thanks for an intersting post cantleave.
Cofty is becoming a caricature of the willful ignorance of atheist. He doesn't understand the first thing about it but he's for it anyway.
The radiometric dating methods and circular reasoning is a major flaw.
James you don't have the slightest clue about science but you know for sure that every time somebody says something about radiometric dating you should respond with the word "circular". You don't know what is supposed to be circular but you think that you heard some creationist preacher say it somewhere.
Cofty is becoming a caricature of the willful ignorance of atheist. He doesn't understand the first thing about it but he's for it anyway.
Who said anything about atheism? Evolution is a fact that is accepted by people of all faiths and none - with the exception of fundamentalist Muslims and bible-bashing christians.
I explained radiometric dating to you in my own words half way down this page...
Still waiting on an single comment or question that would indicate you read it or understood a word of it.
