Why doesn't someone call Simon's office and ask the status of the case? Does anyone have Simon's business number?
Candace Conti v Watchtower Society | June 3, 2013 | Respondent's Brief - prepared by Rick Simons | A136641
by jwleaks 212 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
-
-
frankiespeakin
If this case gets finally settled in Candace's favor you will see the Governing Body scrambling to sell Kingdom Halls to pay for it, I'm sure they have cash on hand to pay it, it is just that the GB will want to keep the books balanced as for profitablity and so there will be a bunch of KH sales to get out of the red so to speak and thus have a glowing annual business meeting before share holders, where the sales will be glanced over and hopefully forgotten.
O and BTW shouldn't the Candace Conti have a mention at the Watchtower Corporation Annual Meeting before all share holders?
-
OUTLAW
Why doesn't someone call Simon's office and ask the status of the case? Does anyone have Simon's business number?.....BOTR
Richard J. Simons, Esq. SBN 72676. 6589 Bellhurst Lane. Castro Valley, CA
94552. 510/582-1080 Telephone. 510/582-8254 Facsimile. [email protected]......................................
...OUTLAW -
Band on the Run
Outlaw,
Thank you for the phone numbers. I must change the title of my car from one state to another. It is going to be a nasty day at DMV. I will telephone the office when someone should be there. My hunch is that it is taking too long. It is obscene how long it takes a case to move up the court system.
-
Gayle
appellatelawyercalifornia.com/id72.html
Interest,,8 mos. in conference now.
-
Emery
I'm sure the WTS has some kind of liability policy that will pay for it.
-
jgnat
Emery, some large corporations self-fund their own liability. Cheaper that way.
-
Gayle
What's happening? 5/20/14 Richard Simons Filed additional cited argument"
Are things wrapping up on the case?
-
villagegirl
Simon - excellent point - The Watchtower Organization, Governing Body, Elders,
have no problem publically naming, announcing publically, and publically
pointing out people and "warning" others about any who violate non-sexual rules
about "daring to disagree" with the WT teachings, or to brand as bad associations
or to hand down edicts to shun children or parents as "bad associations" to be shunned.
Or to publically humiliate "fornicators" who are both consenting adults.
But they protect the "rights" of pedophiles to operate undetected and free ?
THINK about this all you LURKERS and WT onlookers viewing this site.
-
Vidiot
frankiespeakin - "If this case gets finally settled in Candace's favor you will see the Governing Body scrambling to sell Kingdom Halls to pay for it..."
Or maybe a tithe-in-all-but-name-only "pledge".
...OUTLAW