Hi. I just wanted to tell you that I found information in an old catechism. Basically, it shows that *some* Archdioceses abstained from meat on ALL Fridays prior to Vatican II. It is up to the Bishop of each Archdiocese and most Dioceses in the Roman Catholic Rite in the US had that. So that's why your FIL abstained from meat on ALL Fridays but my parents only during Lent because we are from Costa Rica. So YOU are correct in that!
I am correct in stating that it is not and was never a "sin worthy of hell." For a sin worthy of hell, it would have to have the three things I mentioned in the other thread. Any priest or nun who conveyed the idea to your FIL that he would go to hell if he ate meat was WRONG. Or possibly didnt' communicate effectively in a way a child could understand. Also, those older catechisms used language that was more *stern* and, in my opinion, tactless.
On Fridays a Catholic is supposed to do some sort of penitential act or charitable act, not necessarily abstaining from meat. But if a Catholic DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THIS, and thus, doesn't do it, it is not a sin worthy of hell.
The Church didn't "change" this discipline. Fridays have always been the day of penitence from the times of the early Christians. In fact, Christians practiced penance on Wednesdays AND Fridays. What the Church said was, "Instead of us telling you what your penance is going to be, you choose it." The principle is the same though.
I know your point is religions claiming to "speak for God" and this got off topic. That's why I felt embarrassed to continue on the other thread.
Well, I gotta go. I brought work home tonight and can't have fun here on the board for too long.
Bye.