Did not the Romans destroy most of Jerusalem in the 70s C.E? I never heard 66 C.E. any place before. Of course, archaeology moves on. From Bible sources to secular books not dealing with Christianity, the date is always in the 70s. It is obojective fact.
Every prof and source I've read theorize that James and Peter were wiped out in the destruction. They are so prominent until that date. Paul must pay them tribute. James is far more important than Peter, which makes sense if he were Jesus' brother. Jesus' family members may have believed more after the resurrection. The Jerusalem Christian community was the essential one. No one knows why it basically disappeared suddenly.
The loss of Jersualem as the status center for Christianity paved the way for Paul's theology to triumph. Fewer Jewish Christians allowed Christianity to morph from a Jewish sect to a new religion. I am very busy. One of the tasks is to briefly summarize Elaine Pagel's recent book on Revelation. She discusses the prophet John of Patmos (not the beloved disciple or author of John) as one of the last Jewish Christians radically opposed to Paul's views.
This was new to me or I forgot. I want to reread the section and post the key info here. Revelation scares me but I am obsessed with alternate views.
Speaking of Jewish Christians, does anyone know if there remains a fragment or trace of Jewish Chrisitanity in today's world? It would make an interesting comparison.