Heh, good point.
You'd think an 'intelligent designer' would start by working out the kinks on the less-complicated and the least-powerful creations and progressively work their way up to the more-powerful ones; they'd start with the inanimate objects (stars, planets, rocks, dirt), then progress to the fairly-benign non-threatening plants, then the more ominous bacteria, then take on the challenge of making small animals (they can bite with their sharp teeth!), then larger animals, and finally the dangerous and crafty humanoids. After working out bugs on the humans (ie that pesky "free will" defect), the designer would finally create the angels, the ones who could completely throw a wrench in the proverbial monkey-works if the process were to be done, say, in reverse. But since we're dealing with a 'perfect' creator (who cannot make ANY mistakes), that concern obviously wouldn't apply!
And good luck to those experiencing an mild case of cognitive dissonance, if the concept of a perfect God who makes imperfect creations makes any gob-smacking sense to them!
BTW, what was God thinking, making the serpent the "craftiest" beast of the field like that? It apparently was created to be more clever than the humans, since it was able to trick them. ;)