What's interesting about this point is that there have been many "new" points, whereby the "old light" is not even mentioned. I can remember Watchtowers and Convention Talks, where a seasoned JW would say, "That's a new point, or an adjusted view, etc.". When I was new in the so-called "truth", I used to think to myself, how come they didn't mention the old point. Did they do that on purpose so that the newbies wouldn't even notice that a "change" occured to doctrine/teachings??? How was I suppose to know (as the seasoned JW did) that it was a NEW point - IF they didn't tell me what the old point was???
So, when they do mention "old light" in an article, as mentioned in this new thread, I [too] am suspicious about their motive (as highlighted by some of the replies to this thread).
Blondie, you are so right! When the real light went on in my head, I realized just how hypocritical the leaders of this religion are. They always wag a finger at other religion for using scriptures out of context to back up their teachings. Well, the Governing Body, does the same thing! They will use scriptures from any part of the Bible to explain away their "changed" teachings. It's completely unethical what they are doing. I've said it before, and I'll say it again... I don't know how the Governing Body members can look themselves in the mirror and not feel totally disgraced by the hoax that they are carrying on! I sure hope that they read this board, because perhaps one of them will go public and become the new Ray Franz that will expose this fraudelent religion.