While it may seem unlikely which of the currant Governing Body members do you feel would be most likely to defect? I know it is a loaded question.
What about wealthy Anthony Morris III? or Mark Sanderson or Geoffrey Jackson? These are all the newest GBs.
As of September 2012, the following people are members of the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses [7] (year appointed in parentheses):
- Samuel Herd (1999) [84]
- Geoffrey Jackson (2005) [85]
- M. Stephen Lett (1999) [84]
- Gerrit Lösch (1994) [86]
- Anthony Morris III (2005) [85]
- Guy H. Pierce (1999) [84]
- Mark Sanderson (2012) [87] [88]
- David H. Splane (1999) [84]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governing_Body_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses
Headquarters purge [ edit ]
Raymond Franz claimed that in 1980, unease with doctrines surrounding the significance of 1914 surfaced within the Governing Body. In February of that year, three Governing Body members—aware that those who had been alive in 1914 were dying out despite the teaching that their generation would live to see Armageddon—proposed a doctrinal change to identify the "generation" who would see Armageddon as those who witnessed the 1957 launch of the Russian satellite Sputnik, which would be considered a 'sign in heaven'. The proposal, which would have extended the deadline for Armageddon by 43 years, failed to gain a majority vote. [36] [37] Former Witnesses James Penton and Heather and Gary Botting claimed that internal dissatisfaction with official doctrines continued to grow, leading to a series of secret investigations and judicial hearings. As a result, the Governing Body led a purge of dissenting Brooklyn headquarters staff in April and May 1980. [38] [39] [40] Raymond Franz claimed he was forced to resign from the Governing Body, and he was later disfellowshipped from the religion.
The Watch Tower Society responded with a new, hardened attitude towards the treatment of expelled Witnesses. [38] [39] [41] In his 1997 study of the religion, Penton concluded that since Raymond Franz's expulsion in 1980, the Governing Body displayed an increased level of conservatism, sturdy resistance to changes of policy and doctrines, and an increased tendency to isolate dissidents within the organization by means of disfellowshipping. [42]