-
“This is where I am too. For all the stats and maths and surveys, I know from being in contact with several congregations (through friends / family) which means many hundreds of people over a 20-30 year period that there were no cases beyond the few that made the news.
“If the numbers quoted were real then I think many of us would have first hand experience & direct knowledge of cases but I don't think many of us do.”
Simon,
You don’t comprehend how imperceptible 50,000 preventable deaths between 1961 and 2011 would be in the community of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
- In 1961 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 96 congregations. (For a total of 230 preventable deaths)
- In 1971 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 72 congregations. (For a total of 392 preventable deaths)
- In 1981 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 77 congregations. (For a total of 584 preventable deaths)
- In 1991 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 66 congregations. (For a total of 1058 preventable deaths)
- In 2001 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 62 congregations. (For a total of 1528 preventable deaths)
- In 2011 this would amount to 1 death for refusing blood per 57 congregations. (For a total of 1878 preventable deaths)
These preventable deaths have been buried in plain sight for decades. Without reliable data they’d remain buried because wide distribution of incidents would make it practically imperceptible to the average JW.
Adding to imperceptibility would be the standard play-down among JWs of the clinical reason for a given premature death. Only sometimes do we find candor among JWs about a death resulting directly from refusing blood. More often than not we hear sentiments suggesting something akin to “We can’t know for sure why he died” or “Even with a transfusion we can’t know he’d have survived” and the like.
Marvin Shilmer