You are becoming a troll SBF.
When did you last comment on a topic other than to drone on about how nobody knows anything?
You know it irritates the hell out of me so you follow me around the forum ad nauseum
by cofty 188 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
You are becoming a troll SBF.
When did you last comment on a topic other than to drone on about how nobody knows anything?
You know it irritates the hell out of me so you follow me around the forum ad nauseum
I don't imagine Tammy enjoys being told every post she makes is about fake voices in her head.
Do you ever answer questions rather than demand answers from others? Like this one earlier in the thread.
Why do you consider your modernist, atheistic interjections in mystical trains of thought to be legitimate interventions, whereas my perspectivist counter-interjections are viewed as illegitimate attempts to subvert the conversation? If we counted them up I'm sure you've made more such interjections, yet mine are to be especially despised.
Here's some other comments I made in the last day since you ask.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/experiences/265647/1/Nuggets-Latest-work-in-progress-pen-and-ink
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/members/private/88460/6/THE-ESTRANGED-FAMILIES-LIST#.UmQpkTK9KSM
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/265605/1/DubYap-What-is-it
I assumed it was a rhetorical question. I've never seen a "mystical train of thought". What does it look like?
SBF: Please be consistent. Its only your interpretation that you made any other comments. Like you say, if it is more usefull to anyone to claim you didnt, thats the more important...
I suppose you intend to say: "Right now it is useful for me to claim I made some comments"?
What you might call irrational, or a believer expressing their view.
You really think your continuous pot shots at believers are fair game but a perspectivist challenge to your own worldview is illegitimate? How can you possibly justify that hypocritical position?
I assure you I am not an obscurantist for the sake of it. When you claim there is only one right way to view and describe the world I think you are deeply wrong, and that to challenge that perspective is both useful and ethically prudent.
bohm why should I be consistent? The concept of consistency is an enlightenment virtue and in fact unattainable in real life. No one is consistent, to pretend otherwise is the real inconsistency.
I like Foucault's response when he was accused of inconsistency:
And Walt Whitman:
Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes.
SBF:
bohm why should I be consistent? The concept of consistency is an enlightenment virtue and in fact unattainable in real life. No one is consistent, to pretend otherwise is the real inconsistency.
wow.
that philosopher really did a number on you!
The concept of consistency is an enlightenment virtue
content: nil
Frankly, I think you have a rather silly world view, SBF. The idea that nothing really has meaning and everything is just perspective is just a thought-stopper. You keep derailing rational discussion, shifting to your favorite theme rather than joining in the discussion.
BTW, I ordered the book. I'm looking forward to reading it.