Very interesting take.
When the elders speak of Armageddon being right around the corner, do they mean that all these things will suddenly escalate? Many JWs have given me the impression that Armageddon can happen at any time.
Regarding biblical prophecy, prophecy scholar Joel Richardson notes:
We must always remember that the Bible is thoroughly Jerusalem-centric. It is not America-centric, nor is it Western-centric. In the biblical view of things, Jerusalem is the center of the earth. This point cannot be underscored enough.
The Islamic Antichrist: The Shocking Truth about the Real Nature of the Beast (p. 95)
But what of the numerous scriptures that speak of "all nations" of the earth? Are these to be taken literally, especially in light of the above? It appears the JWs have shifted things to suit their point of view. Richardson cites the following scriptures:
...Do 'All Nations' Mean All Nations?...
I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that sends all the surrounding peoples reeling. Judah will be besieged as well as Jerusalem. On that day, when all the nations of the earth are gathered against her, I will make Jerusalem an immovable rock for all the nations. All who try to move it will injure themselves. (Zechariah 12:2–3)
I will gather all the nations to Jerusalem to fight against it. (Zechariah 14:2)
I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel. (Joel 3:2)
The beast…was given power to make war against the saints and to conquer them. And he was given authority over every...nation. (Revelation 13:7)
The JWs (and many other Christian sects) take this at face value. But as Richardson explains:
Since these verses use the word “all” and specifically the phrase “all the nations of the earth” when speaking of the attack against Jerusalem at the battle of Armageddon, then surely it has already been determined that every last nation will fall to the Antichrist’s empire and support him in this battle. I can fully understand how many would arrive at this conclusion.
There are at least two problems with this interpretation, however. First, other verses in the Bible use this very same type of language, yet clearly do not speak of every single last nation in the world. These verses, as well as the previous ones, all employ a Hebrew grammatical construct—an exaggeration of sorts or an emphatic type of statement—in order to convey their point. Grammarians call this construct hyperbole. It is a statement like, “Everyone loves ice cream!”
This type of language is actually found quite frequently in the Bible. For instance, Daniel the Prophet, speaking to King Belshazzar, said this:
O king, the Most High God gave your father Nebuchadnezzar sovereignty and greatness and glory and splendor. Because of the high position he gave him, all the peoples and nations and men of every language dreaded and feared him. (Daniel 5:18–19, emphasis mine)
So I ask you this question: Did every single nation on earth fear Nebuchadnezzar? Or did only those nations that had heard of Nebuchadnezzar dread him? Was Daniel speaking of every single last nation of the earth? Or only those nations that were in close enough proximity to Babylon to be affected by it?
In other words, the beast of Revelation is most likely not the ruler of the entire world, but the part of the world that is being spoken of at the time. One wonders where one single power can consolidate all the governments of the earth. I think sometimes things are taken too literally, and the verse above is only one. Daniel and other writers, including John, speak of all nations being subject to this and that power, but how could he have known about Brazil or Mexico...or Bethel for that matter?
Given everything that must happen before Armageddon, it does not appear it can happen anytime soon from our point of view. Most of the early Watchtowers seemed to place the end of this "wicked system" years ago, even when there were no signs up the road.
.