SNR said-
yeah but copyrighted to the person who writes it !!! Not the society, so again anyone brave enough, copy copy copy.... Bearing in mind you are claiming that writing on paper is now 'copyrited' which I really don't think it is, but as I said, if it is, it is owned by the writer anyway, so no problemo!
Doesn't matter that you don't think it is or not: that's like Perry's not believing in evolution, since it's a FACT right out of the Basics of Copyright Law 101.
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html
When is my work protected?
Your work is under copyright protection the moment it is created and fixed in a tangible form that it is perceptible either directly or with the aid of a machine or device.
When it's written onto paper, it's protected by copyright. So when a musician writes a song onto paper, and lyrics onto napkins, it's copyright-protected; same way as the recorded performance of the song automatically attaches when it's recorded onto tape/hard drive (even all the outtakes). The artist or their label likely will submit a copy for registration to the Library of Congress to beef up their protection, but that's optional.
You're right in that the owner is not the WTBTS, but the random elder (who's not likely to even be aware of the fact they own the copyright, and potentially could sue for infringement, provided the writing overcomes some barriers of originality, etc). But they can sue theoretically for CI, even though as I said, the damages are limited by not registering the work. Pretty low-risk, of course, but as we say in medicine, it's not rare if it's in your chair...
Maybe I'm more aware of it, being an ex-musician who's had to know I.P. law in that prior line of business to stay out of trouble (eg legality of sampling, playing covers in public performance, etc).
SNR said-
Also, the legal team at WT prey on the hopes that people don't realise that copyright law allows for material to be shared for criticism.
Just as many people don't understand that claiming fair use is only a defense, which still must be proven in court. They have the right to claim CI, and lately the content owners haven't even bothered with respecting the DMCA provisions that protect 'fair use' over YouTube videos: if you're using their content, they ignore the individual's right to claim 'fair use', and just yank what they want...
Adam