So many new species being discovered......

by cantleave 26 Replies latest jw friends

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    I think some of you may enjoy this article, it makes a change from hearing about yet another species on the extinct list and shows why we need to conserve our natural heritage.

    http://www.the-scientist.com//?articles.view/articleNo/38639/title/New-Species-Abound/

    In October, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) published a list of 441 new species that have been discovered in the Amazon in the last four years: 258 plants, 84 fish, 58 amphibians, 22 reptiles, 18 birds, and one mammal. That’s “an average of two new species identified every week for the past four years,” read a WWF press release, and “[t]his doesn’t even include the countless discoveries of insects and other invertebrates.”

    The findings are a welcome break from news of impending extinctions, and the new species are a reminder of the importance of continued vigilance and conservation. Of course, the Amazon is not the only place where new life is popping up. Thousands of new species are described each year, hailing from nearly every continent and diverse branches of life. In May, The Scientist covered the International Institute for Species Exploration at Arizona State University’s annual Top 10, with favorites chosen for their unexpected features or their unique habitats. Here are a few of candidates for the 2013 lineup:

    The big one

    A pair of Kobomani tapirs caught on camera trap COURTESY OF FABRÍCIO R. SANTOS This month, researchers described what is likely to be this year’s biggest new species: the Kobomani tapir (Tapirus kabomani), which roams the open grasslands and forests of Brazil and Colombia. Though it’s the smallest of the tapirs, it’s one of the largest animals in South America. Published in the Journal of Mammology, discovery of the tapir makes it the first new Perissodactyla species, which includes rhinos and horses, discovered in more than 100 years, according toMongabay.com.

    The new tapir species isn’t so new to local tribes, however, who regularly hunt the “little black tapir,” as they call it. “[Indigenous people] traditionally reported seeing what they called ‘a different kind of anta [tapir in Portuguese].’ However, the scientific community has never paid much attention to the fact, stating that it was always the same Tapirus terrestris,” lead author and paleontologist Mario Cozzuol of Brazil’s Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
    Belo Horizonte told Mongabay.com. “They did not give value to local knowledge and thought the locals were wrong. Knowledge of the local community needs to be taken into account and that's what we did in our study, which culminated in the discovery of a new species to science.”

    Mammal in the trees

    Wild olinguito at Tandayapa Bird Lodge, Ecuador WIKIMEDIA, MATT GURNEY The olinguito (Bassaricyon neblina) was this year declared to be a distinct species from its close relative, the onlingo, a member of the raccoon family. The new species was first discovered in a drawer, at Chicago’s Field Museum. Kristofer Helgen, curator of mammals at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, found a collection of skin, skulls, and bones that “stopped me in my tracks,” he told BBC News. “The skins were a rich red color and when I looked at the skulls I didn’t recognize the anatomy . . . right away I thought it could be a species new to science.”

    On the basis of a grainy video of an olinguito-like animal in the Andes, Helgen and his colleagues headed to Colombia and Ecuador to find the mammal in the trees of cloud forests. Furry, orange, and weighing less than a kilogram, the olinguito is solitary and nocturnal. It is smaller than the olingo, and the two species have differences in their teeth and tails. Helgen’s team published its findings August 15 in ZooKeys, noting that the olinguito is threatened; construction and farming and destroyed nearly half of its forest habitat. “This reminds us that the world is not yet explored and the age of discovery is far from over,” Helgen told BBC News.

    City bird

    Cambodian tailorbird JAMES EATON/BIRDTOUR ASIA A little bird by the name of the Cambodian tailorbird (Orthotomus chaktomuk), first seen during routine checks for avian flu in 2009, is finally recognized by science, according to a study published in the Oriental Bird Club journal. Belonging to the warbler family, the Cambodian tailorbird can be found living in and around the country’s capital city of Phnom Penh. It resembles other tailorbirds, the researchers report, but its plumage, song, and genes support its reclassification as its own species—something that is rare in urban ecosystems.

    “The modern discovery of an undescribed bird species within the limits of a large populous city—not to mention 30 minutes from my home—is extraordinary,” study coauthor Simon Mahood of the Wildlife Conservation Society told BBC News. “The discovery indicates that new species of birds may still be found in familiar and unexpected locations.”

    Once again, however, as the bird’s small habitat continues to shrink, prompting the researchers to recommend that it be listed as “near threatened” on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List.

    Fish giant

    Arapaima sp. WIKIMEDIA, T. VOEKLER Sleek, eel-like fish known as arapaima have, for some time, been considered to comprise a single species, but new evidence suggests that a classic division of the group into four species is actually more accurate. Moreover, researchers claim to have found a distinct fifth species of arapaima, according to a study published by SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry’s Donald Stewart in the March issue of Copeia.

    “Everybody for 160 years had been saying there’s only one kind of arapaima,” Stewart said in a press release . “But we know now there are various species, including some not previously recognized.”

    A common target of Amazonian fisherman, arapaima are commercially important fish. Curious about the recognition of four species of arapaima in the mid-1800s, Stewart closely examined original specimens and found that they were indeed four species after all. One specimen, held at the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia in Manaus, Brazil, even represents a fifth species (A. leptosoma), Stewart concluded. The sensory cavities on its head have a unique shape, and the fish has a sheath over part of its dorsal fin that other arapaima don’t have. It also has a distinctive color pattern.

    Unfortunately, arapaima have been overfished in the Amazon Basin for more than a century, bringing their current populations to near zero.

    Year of the sharks

    Scalloped hammerhead sharks WIKIMEDIA, YZX Off the coast of South Carolina roams another new species discovered in 2013, the Carolina hammerhead (Sphyrna gilbert), close cousin of the scalloped hammerhead. According to study published in August in the journal Zootaxa, the new shark species is genetically distinct, and has about 10 fewer vertebrae that the scalloped hammerhead.

    The Carolina variety was discovered by University of South Carolina fish expert Joe Quattro, who gathered what appeared to be 80 young scalloped hammerheads. Genetic and anatomical analyses proved otherwise, however. In the end, 54 of the 80 sharks belonged to the new species.

    Quattro expects that, like the dwindling populations of the scalloped shark, the Carolina shark is rare. “Outside of South Carolina, we’ve only seen five tissue samples of the cryptic species,” Quattro said in a release. “And that’s out of three or four hundred specimens.”

    You might think that finding a new species of the largest fish in the ocean is uncommon, and it is, but this year boasts another new shark species: Hemiscyllium halmahera, a shark that “walks” along the sandy bottoms surrounding a remote Indonesian island (see video). Publishing in July in the Journal of Ichthyology, marine biologist Mark Erdmann of Conservation International and his colleagues describe the species. The animals can grow up to 70 centimeters (27 inches) in length, and as with other walking—or epaulette—sharks, females lay their eggs under reef ledges.

    And many more

    With so many new species populating this year’s scientific literature, there simply isn’t room to cover them all. But suffice it to say that diversity is not what this list is lacking: a new orchid from volcanic islands west of Spain, a tiny crustacean found in an offshore reef cave near California’s Catalina Island, the Spectacular Guyane False-form beetle of the French Guiana rainforests, five species of“slavemaker” ants that steal the young of other ants, a humpback dolphin, two gecko species, and a Turkish scorpion. Plus many more just waiting to be found.

  • besty
  • KateWild
    KateWild

    The findings are a welcome break from news of impending extinctions, -cantleave

    Very interesting OP, when we see extinction and new species being discovered, I view this as evolution before our very eyes, I am not an evolutionary biologist so I would welcome corrections here.

    I would say if one species becomes extinct is is because it has not evolved to survive, but new species are evolving in order to survive. I think this is evidence of a survival of the fittest concept.

    But am I right in understanding many evolutionary biologists disagree with this concept?

  • besty
    besty

    "new species" meaning we have just noticed them :-)

  • adamah
    adamah

    Kate said- Very interesting OP, when we see extinction and new species being discovered, I view this as evolution before our very eyes, I am not an evolutionary biologist so I would welcome corrections here.

    Well, a new discovery of a species is only that: a discovery of a species, and NOT the emergence of a new species before our eyes.

    But yes, extinction is part of the process of evolution, since it leaves a niche open in the environment for some other species to eventually exploit and fill. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, Mother Nature allows for species to fill an unexploited niche.

    Kate said- I would say if one species becomes extinct is is because it has not evolved to survive, but new species are evolving in order to survive. I think this is evidence of a survival of the fittest concept.

    Unfortunately the process of evolution doesn't guarantee that any given species WILL survive. And that's the entire tragedy of extinction: it means the entire members of a species are wiped out, thus representing an end of a process that took billions of years to acheive. That probably occurs for many species even before they're even been discovered by science, and some of the recently-discovered species have gone on to become extinct.

    And why do endangered species go extinct? Read the article, as it mentions some factors: human encroachment on their habitat, or even the slight shifts in temperatures due to global climate change can be so disruptive and sudden, there's not enough time for a species to adapt to the change, so it goes extinct.

    BTW, you really need to stop repeating the old meme, "survival of the fittest". It's generally wrong, since it's not applicable to all situations, and assuming it to be the major driving force behind adaptation is only going to unnecessarily confuse yourself and others. Instead, use an expression that conveys a more-accurate sense of what's happening, something like, "survival of those who manage to navigate changes in their environment to hang on for dear life", since that's the actual case.

    Adam

  • KateWild
    KateWild

    BTW, you should quit repeating the old meme, "survival of the fittest". It's generally wrong-Adam

    I get this part of your post. You believe survival of the fittest is an old meme, but it's the first time I have posted it to my knowledge. Where have I posted it beofre Adam? Do you have a link?

    Kate xx

  • KateWild
    KateWild

    since it's not applicable to all situations, and assuming it as the major driving force behind adaptation is only going to confuse yourself and others. -Adam

    I have read this lots of times, and it's more confusing than the term "survival of the fittest". please simplify your term for me Adam.

  • KateWild
    KateWild

    Instead, use an expression that conveys a more-accurate sense of what's happening-adam

    Why is your long winded sentence more accurate that simply "survival of the fittest"?

    Do evolutionary biologists disagree with this concept, if so why?

  • adamah
    adamah

    You believe survival of the fittest is an old meme, but it's the first time I have posted it to my knowledge.

    Good. So let it be your last, as well, since I just told you it's wrong, and it's also a fave meme that Young Earth Creationists like to broadcast as the position of evolution, when it's a "strawman", a flat-out misrepresentation of the position of evolutionary biologists for over a century (it's one of the few things which Darwin and Wallace got wrong in their original work, but we now know better, thanks to further refinements of the theory of evolution due to work of others who continued their work).

    Adam

  • KateWild
    KateWild

    since I just told you it's wrong,-adam

    Lol excuse me!!!!! Since Adam is never wrong, he can be rude too, chill out and calm down Adam, I hate biology so if you want to teach me something you need to be interesting and polite, otherwise I wont read anything you write, and if I want links I can surf the web. We can just have a simple live chat. Okay Adam???

    This is your baby, and I want to learn, don't rock the boat Adam. Love you to bits Kate xx

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit