So, normally if I go to a meeting I sit and don't say a word through the entire ordeal. However today I just could not keep my big mouth shut.
It was funny that I even got called on....THREE times none-the-less. Of course 99% of the sheeple just sat with blank looks on their mugs this morning. So the conductor was scraping the bottom of the barrel.
My three comments warranted a pretty caustic ass-chewing though after the meeting.
Here they are:
Par. 3 The fullfillment of Isa. 7: 14, 16 is often applied to Jesus. However the "slave" says it MUST have really applied to Isaiah's son because the kings of Syria and Israel were no longer a threat to Judah in the first century. It HAD to be in Isaiahs day because the Assyrians were still a world power.
Par. 11 Unlike the prophecy of Isaiah in par. 3 that the "slave" said depended on the Assyrians existing for fulfillment, the prophecy of Micah 5: 1, 2 could not have been fulfilled when the Assyrians existed. The "slave" says this prophecy MUST be fulfilled LONG after Jesus was born, and the Assyrians no longer were a world power. It could only be a modern day "Assyrian".
Par. 11 The four conclusions written in the WT can best be regarded against the question in par. 5, "...do I put my trust in GOD, or in men?"
I thought maybe someone was going to get some "holy" water and throw at me. But there were a few I noticed that seem to have a spark of light come into their eyes about the double-speak.