Booby said:
: That's complete nonsense. You WANT to believe that science has disproved the flood, the same as people WANT to believe that evolution is true. That's in fact what the Scripture says, that "according to their WISH this fact escapes their notice."
It's not that science has disproved a global Flood, Booby, but that there exists absolutely no evidence for one. None. Nada. Zip.
It's like claiming that you, Booby, are a maker of true predictions. But anyone can know, based on your record, that you're not. You have made no correct predictions. Not one. Nada. Zip.
A complete lack of evidence to support a claim that would necessarily generate massive amounts of it is not simply suggestive of, but absolute proof, that the claim is false.
You claim to make correct predictions? Show me one. You claim there's evidence for a Flood? Show it to me.
But you can't show anything at all. And neither can anyone else. Therefore your claims are demonstrably false.
But it doesn't matter to the true believer. They believe, not because of evidence, but because of a need to believe. That's why young-earth creationists believe. That's why Jehovah's Witnesses believe. That's why you believe. That's what is embodied in the spirit of the Scripture says that "according to their WISH this fact escapes their notice." Wishing doesn't make your wishes true, Booby.
Several years ago, you decided to educate yourself a bit about geology so as to be able to defend the idea of a Flood. Obviously, your reading showed you that you couldn't find any evidence. In fact, it showed you the contrary. So you gave up and reverted back to the usual meaningless generalities that fuel the engines of true believers everywhere.
Such a sad little man. Such a sad religion.
AlanF
