I like the whole:
"Where else can you see such unity but in Jehovahs organization?" In which case i bring out the fact that even when the Society was wrong on something and it wasnt based on the Bible they all believed what was false as the truth. And imay ask them if theyve heard of the walsh trial:
Q: It was promulgated as a matter which must [have been] believed by all members of Jehovah’s Witnesses that the Lord’s Second Com- ing took place in 1874...?
A: It was a false statement or an erroneous statement in fulfillment of a prophecy that was false or erroneous.
Q: And that had to be believed by the whole of Jehovah’s Witnesses? A: Yes, because you must understand we must have unity ...
Q: Back to the point now. A false prophecy was promulgated?
A: I agree to that.144
Q: It had to be accepted by Jehovah’s Witnesses?
A: That is correct.
Q: If a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses took the view himself that that prophecy was wrong and said so, he would be disfellowshipped?
A: Yes ... Our purpose is to have unity.
Q: Unity at all costs?
A: Unity at all costs...
Q: A unity based upon an enforced acceptance of false prophecy?
A: That is conceded to be true.
hm
JP