Read 1.5 hours worth on Conti case files (examination & cross-examination). Here is my take (and I consider myself a pretty logical person able to set aside emotion...I've never been abuse but know people who have been).
The jury was completely right in awarding the judgement to Conti. As far as the award amount, I don't care to comment on. However, this is what happens when there is a centralized governing body that makes all the decisions. This is why a non-centralized approach is much better. The GB is making decisions on things that they are not witnesses to (confession, individual circumstances). They are making judgements from their tower in NY about something that really should be decided upon by a vote via the Elders in the local congreation.
Churches need to pick what they want, non-profit status granted by the government (which sure as hell holds them to a higher standard of expectations) or more of an autonomous congregational setting. These big organizations bask in the tax free status the GOVERNMENT grants them, and then whines when they are held to a high standard and code of ethics. I am all for maximum freedom of religion, the bill of rights and constitution. However, the WT shot themselves in the foot, and so did the local congregation.
After reading these files, I will never be an Elder because I am not going to leave myself open to civil suits just because I was a 'yes man' and took orders. Did these Elders get sued individually? If so, for how much?