by DATA-DOG 387 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
To be honest, I don't think arguing over the definition of words is helping anyone.
Heavensgate as the only other active jw on this thread, you're doing a really bad job at helping dot come to grips with what they are reading.
Quite frankly, seeing the amount of time you've taken to NOT answer a relatively simple question and instead get into pointless arguments, makes me think you're trying to stall
Marked
DOT
Spoken like a true Englishmen.
long-winded speeches in semi broken English : defender of truth 你擁有自己的
That’s the art of shunning, overcoming stupidity.
per·cep·tion
noun: perception; plural noun: perceptions
the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the senses.
pre·con·cep·tion
noun: preconception; plural noun: preconceptions; noun: pre-conception; plural noun: pre-conceptions
a preconceived idea or prejudice.
And I thought DOT was the active JW. LOL
Heavens: The question is, are the JWs Jehovahs prophet, according to their own definition of a prophet?
If so are they a true prophet or false prophet according to their own definition?
the definition can be found in the insight book or the reasoning book.
thanks
ps this is not data dog under a different screen name
The"faithful slave" , so called, have never been a faithful anything . Neither a prophet or gods mouthpiece.
They are 8 men totally caught up in the business of relicom comfortable in the knowledge that they are
bolstered by individuals too scared to question them(for the most part) I only hope more like d.o.t will
Ask questions. Cmon be brave it's your life!!
Relicom;...Religious commercialism (don't try the dictionary lol).
I think that heavensgate is a wind up merchant. Are you for real heavensgate? Why are you on this site?
We have asked you lots of questions and you have ignored most of them, or answred abiguously. You have ignored all my questions. I have my suspicions who you really are, looking at your writing style and looking at past posters that have stopped posting.
Kate xx
Heavensgate can do nothing against the Truth, only for the Truth. With each tappy-tap-tap of the keyboard, honest ones see through the subterfuge.
DD
Heavensgate said:"a preconceived idea or prejudice" in reference to me saying (in context) "..throwing in words nobody understands in a rather unusual way, and then calling them 'fools' because they don't seem to be understanding your long-winded speeches in semi broken English.. You may put people off from talking to you.""
..If you are accusing me of being racially prejudiced, please don't waste my time.
I was brought up to have no tolerance for racism. Furthermore, I am not technically an 'Englishman', I'm Portugese, brought up and educated in England. Talk about judging before you know someone!
Your phrase 'true englishman' reveals far more of YOUR prejudice, my brother.
I am sorry if you found my wording to be upsetting, or if you have suffered racial abuse..
I am not attacking you, I am simply pointing out that you are posting in a 'long winded' way, which means using more words than may be needed, with a writing style that is hard to follow.
When people do not understand a word or sentence you have used, all you need to do is try to explain what it is that you meant. It does not mean that we are not listening..
You can't call people foolish for not understanding, just because your sentences sometimes don't quite make sense. It is unfair, and I find your accusation very offensive indeed. Now, can we discuss the points that I mentioned in my post number 55 in an adult way, and try to not judge each other, please?
*I hold out my hand to offer an apology, will you accept it?*
DOT, you have a pm.
HG, "true Englishmen", really?? "No true Scotsman" is more like it. OHH Snap!!!
DD
