Jesus washing feet in underwear or naked?

by John_Mann 14 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    There's a lot of strange assumptions floating around here:

    First, even in plain English, "naked" is often used to mean "only wearing underwear". Similarly, "taking off one's clothes" can also mean "stripping to one's underwear". This is just basic English we're talking about here.

    Second, as Londo111 indicated, nudity is not automatically erotic. That's a very chronocentric and ethnocentric way of thinking. Wearing a towel to protect one's nudity after a bath is a modern concept. Towels were used for drying, not for wearing, in a culture where bathing publicly with the same sex was common.

    That being said:

    The WT "translates" himatia as outer garments but some other translations says just clothes

    Didn't you answer your own question here? A himation was the cloak that people draped over themselves as an outer garment. Although I can't speak for the unnamed disciple who was seemingly going commando, most people would certainly have worn underwear underneath it. Draping a towel around himself was simply a way of keeping off the ground the object that was being used to dry the feet after they were clean.

    hi·jack ˈhīˌjak/ verb past tense: hijacked; past participle: hijacked

    LOL, that was an apropos way to hijack the thread.

  • transhuman68
    transhuman68

    LOL, since Jesus was probably butt-naked it gives new meaning to what he in Matt 5:39 said about 'turning the other cheek'.

  • Spectre
    Spectre

    Yeah, guys had to walking around in the buff all the time back in the day. I mean, why else would circumcision be so important?

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    But once again, there is no reason to think Jesus didn't leave his inner garment, e.g., his underwear, on. The Greek word "himation" is the outer cloak.

    To your point, Spectre, it's true that if you knew a bunch of guys back then, you probably found out pretty soon whether or not they were circumcised. The Greeks considered circumcision to be perverse because it exposed the head of the penis. As long as you were "covered" down there while you were completely naked in a public bath or gym, you were modest. Circumcised men were therefore not modest. Whereas the Jews found the natural state of the male organ to be gross, so it was bound to have resulted in the issue that was taken to the elders in Jerusalem.

  • kurtbethel
    kurtbethel

    Watchtower Jesus gets Baptised

    The Kingdom is at Hand - page 65 Rub a Dub!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit