According to WT tamud, if a JW does in-vitro fertilization, carries a surrogate child, uses a surrogate, and so forth then it is "Por-neia".
The Bible says that Mary was a virgin when implanted with the embryo of Jesus Christ. Under the Mosaic law adultery was punishable by death. Since Mary was already engaged to Joseph, if she was to sleep with another man it was the same as adultery in the eyes of the law. As we all know, she was not lying and she was still a virgin when she carried Jesus. Under WT rules she was NOT a virgin.
Mary and YHWH were in violation of current WT rules on this matter, Both Jehovah and Mary were actually guilty of "Por-neia" since she was a surrogate mother of a child not belonging to Joseph.
Has anyone else thought of this or am I crazy?
Also I cant find the QFR on this matter. If someone can post the WT ruling I appreciate it, thanks!