I hope the link works....it's on dailygalaxy anyway and deals with the mystery of how plants seem to make decisions.
Rather than choose between atheism or theism, I choose pantheism - that the universe has a degree of consciousness distributed thruout it, perhaps even down to the quantum level. We can call this background of a maintained cosmos "God" if we want. It is why the universe has consistent laws and standards and keeps them going across billions of miles and eons of time - but it isn't a person, as we think of it.
When the Apostle Paul wrote that "God" was made manifest thru looking at creation, he was simply wrong because there is no morality in creation - a fact recognized by Darwin and various philosophers thruout centuries.
I wish we could explore the idea of "intelligent design" without reference to a personal creator. Unfortunately, that may not be possible as I found out after attending a screening of "Expelled" years ago which documented suppression of such research. Immediately after it ended, a lay pastor got up and started preaching about how this should motivate people to reject evolution, blah, blah, blah. I sighed and left.
I think we will see more and more discoveries about mind and consciousness around us in the future. That's my speculation. For some, the idea of a synthesis between atheism and theism is revolutionary. If so, more power to them.
metatron