21 YEAR OLD DIES REFUSING MEDICAL AID

by deddaisy 19 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    These articles most likely have previously been posted, one is from 2000 but I'm posting them in response to "DEAD LAMBS" in the May 15, 2002 Friends Forum....As the articles are from a news database, I don't have any links...... (yes, I edited and changed this, you're not losing it....)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Copyright 2000 ITAR-TASS News Agency
    TASS

    April 17, 2000, Monday

    LENGTH: 153 words

    HEADLINE: Jehovah's "witness" dies refusing medical aid banned by sect

    BYLINE: By Eka Mekhuzla

    DATELINE: TBILISI, April 17

    BODY:
    The 21-year-old Lia Dzhankanidze, member of Jehovah's witnesses sect, died in the Tbilisi First Clinical Hospital after she had
    rejected blood transfusion for religious reasons, which proved fatal. The patient's death was caused by a gangrene on her left leg
    which developed as a result of thrombo-phlebitis. For several days doctors and representatives of the public had persuaded Lia
    and her mother to agree to blood transfusion, but all efforts were in vain. The patient has undergone surgery without the
    necessary medical procedure, which cost her life.

    The incident has evoked a strong negative response in Georgia. Georgian MP Guram Sharadze has declared that it not the first
    incident when young people involved in Jehovah's witnesses sect refused blood transfusion which was vitally important. The
    Georgian MP intends to demand that the activities of the totalitarian sect be banned in Georgia.

  • dungbeetle
    dungbeetle

    Excuse me, but if you're posting this in response to another thread, why don't you put it in that thread?

    It's meant as a rhetorical question.

    BEFORE YOU TRY AND REMOVE THE STICK FROM MY ARSE, REMOVE THE TELEPHONE POLE FROM YOUR OWN ARSE.

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    dungbeetle,
    maybe I should have, but I commented to eddie (in his thread) that I would post them here in case anyone wanted to see them. Some of them are long and I didn't want to just BOMBARD his thread with articles.....

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    ARTICLE #2
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Copyright 2000 AllAfrica, Inc
    Africa News

    October 5, 2000

    SECTION: NEWS, DOCUMENTS & COMMENTARY

    LENGTH: 486 words

    HEADLINE: Zambia;
    Baby Battles For Life As Parents Reject Blood Transfusion

    BYLINE: Panafrican News Agency

    BODY:

    Lusaka, Zambia (PANA) - A six-month-old baby is battling for her life at the Lusaka University Teaching Hospital (UTH) after
    her parents who belong to the Jehovah's Witnesses sect rejected a blood transfusion to save her life on religious grounds.

    The baby's parents, Mr. and Mrs. Cleophas Mulumba who travelled from the Democratic Republic of Congo for the operation in
    the country have refused to have the blood transfusion carried out.

    They said that they had deep-rooted belief in Christianity which was explicit about the handling of blood. According to the
    state-run 'Times of Zambia' newspaper, Beatrice Kashimba, who underwent surgery last Monday for a condition called Biliary
    Atresia lost vital pints of blood and body fluids after the operation when she developed diarrhoea and vomiting.

    UTH medical personnel said the condition of Beatrice, who was looking pale and weak, was grave and unless a blood
    transfusion was carried out, her chances of survival were very slim.

    The parents, however, quoted a section of the Holy Bible, which states that: "The Holy Spirit and we have agreed not to put any
    other burden on you besides those necessary rules. "Eat no food that has been offered to idols, eat no blood, eat no animals that
    have been strangled and keep yourselves from sexual immorality. You will do well if you take care not to do these things with our
    best wishes."

    UTH public relations officer, Pauline Mbangweta, expressed the hope that the parents would soon realise the gravity of the
    condition of the child and allow the transfusion.

    "The doctors were doing everything possible and had put the child on blood supplements. I hope the parents would have a change
    of heart and allow ... blood transfusion," Mbangweta said.

    Meanwhile, Clement Samabona, spokesman of the Jehovah Witnesses' Watch Tower Society in Zambia said the refusal by the
    parents to consent to blood transfusion was their personal belief and not that of the Church.

    "There is no policy in the Church which bars anyone from blood transfusion, it is all a personal choice that anyone is entitled to,"
    Samabona said.

    But Jason Sakala, another Watch Tower member, supported the parents' decision. He quoted Genesis 9 verses 4-16 to support
    his views that the eating of blood is forbidden and anyone who disobeys this is disobeying God's law.

    "I am in support of the parents because they are using God's words as their guidance. If they decide to do otherwise then they will
    be disrespectful to God's law," Sakala told PANA.

    He added, "putting one's life ahead of God's law is fatal, as Mark 8: 35 and 36 tells us."

    Sakala said there were other ways the hospital could supplement the needed blood other than transfusion.

    Meanwhile, Beatice's parents are enraged with the Times of Zambia for carrying a front page picture Thursday of their baby lying
    in agony at UTH, with a swollen stomach.

    ____________________________________________________________________

    Meanwhile, Clement Samabona, spokesman of the Jehovah Witnesses' Watch Tower Society in Zambia said the refusal by the
    parents to consent to blood transfusion was their personal belief and not that of the Church.

    "There is no policy in the Church which bars anyone from blood transfusion, it is all a personal choice that anyone is entitled to,"
    Samabona said.
    ______________________________________________________________________ Does that sound like the WTS is trying to "shrug" off any responsibility? Talk about adding insult to injury.......

  • dungbeetle
    dungbeetle

    I gotcha.

    Are there any links to these articles?

    That way they can be passed around to JW's or interested non-JW's with out going through 'Apostate" sources.

    BEFORE YOU TRY AND REMOVE THE STICK FROM MY ARSE, REMOVE THE TELEPHONE POLE FROM YOUR OWN ARSE.

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    ARTICLE 3
    _____________________________________________________________________

    CanWest Global Communications Corp.
    All Rights Reserved
    The Vancouver Sun

    February 3, 2001 Saturday FINAL EDITION

    SECTION: NEWS, Pg. B1 / Front

    LENGTH: 683 words

    HEADLINE: Patient who refused blood has right to sue: Court rules man can sue the hospital where his Jehovah's Witness
    wife died

    BYLINE: Neal Hall

    SOURCE: Vancouver Sun

    BODY:
    A Jehovah's Witness who signed a release form refusing any blood transfusions before she died during a routine operation did
    not sign away her right to sue for medical negligence, a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled Friday.

    Daphne Hobbs underwent a hysterectomy at Chilliwack General Hospital on April 15, 1996. The operation was expected to take
    up to two hours and result in the loss of about 200 millilitres of blood.

    Instead, there was unexpected and substantial bleeding during the operation. The 36-year-old mother of three died at 1 a.m. the
    next day after losing all her circulating blood, about 4,000 ml. Her husband, Ernest Hobbs, filed a lawsuit in 1998, claiming
    negligence against the hospital and a number of doctors. A number of defendants were struck from the case, which is proceedings
    against Dr. John Robertson, the obstetrician who performed the operation, and Dr. A.A. Suleman, the anesthetist.

    Ernest Hobbs filed the lawsuit on behalf of his children Kaleb, 6, Travis, 10 and Jada, 12.

    A trial was set for last Dec. 4 but a legal issue that had to be sorted out first was whether the release form, specifying that Daphne
    Hobbs refused to accept blood or blood products for religious reasons, absolved the doctors of liability.

    Justice Allen Melvin, in a 21-page written judgment, decided it did not. "In my opinion, the form she signed does not ... amount to
    a voluntary assumption of risk of surgeons' negligence by Mrs. Hobbs," the judge concluded.

    "A contrary conclusion could result in patients (who do not sign releases) receiving a higher standard of care than those who do
    so."

    As a result of the decision, the matter will now proceed to trial or possibly an out-of-court settlement, said lawyer Lou Zivot, who
    is acting for Ernest Hobbs, 46.

    "With this hurdle out of the way, I would hope we could proceed to talking about settlement," Zivot said.

    "This is quite a novel point," he said of the legal issue.

    According to court documents, the doctors deny their care of the patient was negligent. Robertson's statement of defence says he
    "exercised reasonable care, skill and diligence."

    Robertson concluded the death "could have been prevented if this lady could have received blood and coagulation products."

    An affidavit filed by Ernest Hobbs states he was called to the hospital and was advised there had been some bleeding.

    "It was sometime after my arrival that I was asked ... about giving Daphne blood and I told him I would not go against her wishes
    or religious convictions," the affidavit says.

    "Nobody told me that even if blood had been given at that time, whether it would make a difference. I was simply told that it was
    unlikely she would survive."

    An affidavit by Dr. Mark Hobbs, a Montreal obstetrician and gynecologist retained by Hobbs's lawyer, said Robertson's
    operative report on the surgery was inadequate because "it does not detail all the events that must have occurred during this
    four-hour operation."

    Boyd, who noted he had treated numerous Jehovah's Witness patients, wrote that it appeared Daphne Hobbs had been given
    massive amounts of crystalloids that had "washed out" all the clotting factors in her blood so it could not coagulate.

    Boyd said Hobbs suffered a pelvic hemorrhage, which is hard to see during vaginal surgery. He suggested Robertson "should have
    opened the abdomen and controlled the bleeding" rather than continuing the operation vaginally.

    Robertson's operation report stated "the site of the bleeding could not be easily ascertained."

    Daphne Hobbs had sought the operation to solve a bleeding problem. She told her husband it was low risk. Previously, she had
    attended hospital for four medical procedures, including a cesarean section, and each time had signed a release form refusing to
    permit blood transfusions.

    The operation record shows the surgery commenced at 12:18 p.m. and finished at 4:35 p.m.

    Initially, there was one intravenous line connected to Hobbs but a second line was connected at 1:45, when she was given 10 per
    cent dextran, a blood substitute. _

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    ARTICLE 4 (AGAIN, SORRY BUT I DON'T HAVE LINKS BECAUSE THESE ARE COPIED TO DISC FROM A NEWS DATABASE)
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Copyright 2001 CanWest Interactive, a division of
    CanWest Global Communications Corp.
    All Rights Reserved
    The Star Phoenix (Saskatoon)

    July 4, 2001 Wednesday Final Edition

    SECTION: Local/Regional; Pg. A5

    LENGTH: 420 words

    HEADLINE: Dead teen held firm to faith: Youth involved in crash a Jehovah's Witness, refused to accept blood transfusion

    SOURCE: Saskatchewan News Network; Regina Leader-Post

    BYLINE: Mike O'Brien

    DATELINE: REGINA

    BODY:
    REGINA -- Dylan Boe held on to his faith until the end.

    The 19-year-old was the only one of four young friends who wasn't immediately killed in a two-vehicle crash Saturday near
    Melville.

    Like Preston Presiloski, Adam Anderson and Elisha Stasiuk, Boe was a Jehovah's Witness. Despite numerous injuries, Boe
    told medical staff at the hospitals in Melville and, later, in Regina, that he would not break one of his faith's principle rules. "He
    made it very plain and clear he was one of Jehovah's Witnesses and as such he would not accept a blood transfusion," said Kim
    Gilbert, an elder with the Parkdale congregation in north Regina, where all four of the dead attended services.

    Boe underwent one operation in Regina Saturday to remove his spleen. A second operation to treat broken bones and other
    injuries was halted midway after his vital signs faltered, said Gilbert, who was with Boe and his family when the young man died in
    hospital later that day.

    "He had this grin," Gilbert said. "That was Dylan . . . he had a heart as big as the world and he was just as goofy."

    Boe's final day illustrated what Gilbert called the most important aspect of the four friend's lives -- their faith. All were baptized
    ordained ministers whose primary focus was spreading their faith.

    Early Saturday, the four young people were returning from friends' graduation celebrations in Melville, Gilbert said.

    According to RCMP, they were northbound on a grid road and trying to cross Highway 15 when they collided with an eastbound
    vehicle, half a kilometre east of Melville. Two of the four were not wearing seatbelts. The 16-year-old Melville female in the
    eastbound car sustained minor injuries.

    "It's really going to make the young ones in our congregation sit up and take notice of their lives, what they want to do with them,"
    Gilbert said of the deaths.

    He described all four as happy people with interests that included music, art and sports. "They basically grew up together. . . .
    These guys have met every week for the last 10 years."

    Boe worked for a seed cleaning firm; Anderson, 20, was a sales representative for Superstore; Presiloski, 18, delivered
    newspapers; and Stasiuk, a 16-year-old high school student, wanted to become a hair stylist.

    Most of the city's nearly 600 Jehovah's Witnesses are likely to attend the memorial service for all four friends held today.

    Citing patient confidentiality, a Regina Health District spokesperson declined to discuss Boe's medical treatment.

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    ARTICLE 5
    ___________________________________________________________________

    Deutsche Presse-Agentur

    December 11, 1998, Friday, BC Cycle
    01:33 Central European Time

    SECTION: International News

    LENGTH: 89 words

    HEADLINE: Woman dies after refusing blood transfusion

    DATELINE: Sydney

    BODY:

    A Jehovah's Witness died in an Australian hospital after refusing a blood donation that would have
    kept her alive, news resports Friday said.

    The death in a Brisbane hospital of the 26-year-old married woman coincides with a legal battle in
    Melbourne over whether doctors were right to override the written request of a 20-year-old
    Jehovah's Witness not to be given blood. The doctors acted with the verbal consent of her
    husband.

    Jehovah's Witnesses, a Christian sect, say the Bible forbids the transfusion of blood.

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    THIS LAST COMMENTARY IS FROM A JOURNAL. CHECK OUT THE REFERENCES. AGAIN, IT'S FROM A DATABASE SO I DON'T HAVE A LINK.....
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Copyright 2000 by The Lancet Ltd
    The Lancet

    Lancet 2000; 356 (9223): 8

    July 1, 2000

    SECTION: Commentary

    LENGTH: 291 words

    TITLE: Jehovah's Witnesses' blood policy

    SOURCE: The Lancet, London WC1X 8RR, UK

    AUTHOR: Sharp, David

    TEXT:

    For a brief moment earlier this month there seemed to be a change to a spiritual doctrine that has
    worried physicians and surgeons for many years. Jehovah's Witnesses, the 6 million adherents of a
    Christian religion, interpret a biblical injunction as meaning that transfusions of whole blood or its
    primary components are not allowed. Sometimes alternatives or specialists in blood-free
    management, or both, are available, and the Jehovah's Witnesses try to educate doctors about these;
    or the patient survives the crisis without blood. Less happy outcomes are recourse to the courts-or
    the avoidable, in a clinician's view, death of a patient.

    On June 14 a British newspaper report referred to "an extraordinary U-turn",n 1* dating back to last
    April but not well publicised until now. The acceptance of a transfusion would not lead to active
    banishment by the church; such an act would, in the language of the Jehovah's Witnesses, become a
    "non-disfellowshipping event". Almost immediately, the religion's offices in New York and London,n
    2* n 3* were asserting how little had in fact changed. To accept a blood transfusion is tantamount
    to self-expulsion, it is argued, so there is no need for congregations to take action.

    Also of significance, again only at first sight, could be a 1998 judgment referred to in a letter in this
    week's Lancet. The judge said that a court order allowing blood transfusion against the wishes of
    the child and the parents would have been right whether the child was "Gillick incompetent" or not.
    The Jehovah's Witnesses' position on this case is to accept the reality that courts will use a
    "competent and 18" test-while still hoping for recognition of the "autonomy of mature young people".

    REFERENCES:

    ( n1 ). Gledhill R. U-turn on blood transfusions by Witnesses. Times June 14, 2000.

    ( n2 ). Jehovah's Witnesses Public Affairs Office, New York. Statement to the media (June 14,
    2000); Jehovah's Witnesses reaffirm religious doctrine on blood transfusions (June 15, 2000).

    ( n3 ). Gillies P. Choice for Witnesses. Times June 21, 2000.

  • Schibolet
    Schibolet

    Apostates just crack me up!

    Notice the subject of this thread: "21 YEAR OLD DIES REFUSING MEDICAL AID"

    What a wonderful way of twisting the truth. My brother did not refuse "medical aid", he refused blood. All JWs love life and want to live. They will look at all medical ways of saving their life. Blood is not a choice. JWs have standards and will not nogotiate with Jehovah on the matter of blood. We are nobody to question Jehovah and his rightous ways. If he said "no blood" then it's no blood. Simple. Apostates will try to twist the JW view to discredit their faithfulness and loyalty to Jehovah.

    JWs are not here to please apostates. They only rejoice in following Jehovah's laws and principles.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit