"We UNDERSTAND that in mentioning 'this generation,' Jesus was referring to two groups of anointed Christians."
I asked our local elder who is included in the "WE" since obviously I do not consider myself part of the WE who understood it. First of all, never in the stretch of my imagination had I thought that Jesus Christ was referring to 2 annointed Christians. When we were studying the bible back in the mid 80's, there was no mention whatsoever about it. WT study articles would always drive the point that the end is near with the remnants of the annointed dwindling in no. (based on decreasing no. of Memorial partakers).
If WE truly understood the interpretation, why even some of our elders and Ministerial Servants had to digest and re-digest? Even some of the intellectual ones in our congregation were discussing and figuring out after the WT study session. The WT could have cited examples to clarify the 2 annointed groups - instead of leaving the idea open to confusion, further explanation and re-interpretation by the brothers.
Questions:
Instead of We UNDERSTAND, why the WT did not use the past tense UNDERSTOOD since they had already cited similar interpretation in April 15, 2010 edition of the WT?
Why only after almost a 100 years since 1914 did the FDS understood about the 2 annointed groups' significance on "this generation"? As early as 1990s when new GB member Mark Sanderson was already considered as annointed, the GB could have realized the overlapping thing since substantial facts were already available for their consideration at that time. But it took them another 20 years to finally UNDERSTOOD it. Was the holy spirit not present during the stretch of 20 years to shed light on the FDS? Or was the holy spirit really needed for the GB to indentify the 2 groups and clarify it just this year?
Somehow, one would think that with the changes in the members of the GB, teachings like this are just bound to change.